Colin Hart won't be voting Tyson into the HOF

[rjj tszyu]

I remember Hart was radio commentating on the SRL v Hearns II fight and he had Leonard winning it even with the 2 knock downs and the crowd booing he still did not get it.

Fair enough he got that wrong, and he did have a soft spot for leonard BUT all in all I don't mind him!

[Master]

I remember Hart was radio commentating on the SRL v Hearns II fight and he had Leonard winning it even with the 2 knock downs and the crowd booing he still did not get it.

Fair enough he got that wrong, and he did have a soft spot for leonard BUT all in all I don't mind him!

Head up Leonard's ass more like.

[Howlin Mad Missy]

change the crime to murder or kiddy fiddling, would you still be saying let him in?

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

change the crime to murder or kiddy fiddling, would you still be saying let him in?

If he was better than Barry McGuigan then yes.

[Howlin Mad Missy]

you're all slating Colin Hart for going with what he believes is right...Pac is guilty based on no evidence...yet a good portion of you are more than happy to disagree with the court/jurors who found Tyson guilty of rape.

Fools

[ono]

you're all slating Colin Hart for going with what he believes is right...Pac is guilty based on no evidence...yet a good portion of you are more than happy to disagree with the court/jurors who found Tyson guilty of rape.

Fools

[ross]

you're all slating Colin Hart for going with what he believes is right...Pac is guilty based on no evidence...yet a good portion of you are more than happy to disagree with the court/jurors who found Tyson guilty of rape.

Fools

Colin Hart is being asked "Do Mike Tysons boxing acheivments make him deserving of a place in the hall of fame?"

Hes not being asked "Is Mike Tyson a model citizen?"

As for Pacquiao. Hes the one that has refused to take random tests. No other boxer has refused to take random tests.

That makes him as guilty as someone whos driving eraticly and stopped by police and then they refuse a breath test. They havent been proved to have any alcohol in the system but they will still get in shiit!!

[Howlin Mad Missy]

they're both the same - based on opinion.

Like I asked if Tyson was a CONVICTED murderer or kiddy fiddler would you all be saying Hart is wrong?

Latent misogyny.

[generalbulldog]

you're all slating Colin Hart for going with what he believes is right...Pac is guilty based on no evidence...yet a good portion of you are more than happy to disagree with the court/jurors who found Tyson guilty of rape.

Fools

Extremely good point. So according to some people Pacquiao is without a doubt guilty because he refused to take a drug test, while Mike Tyson is "innocent" after having been tried and convicted.

Now if Tyson was convicted on let's say molesting and sexually assaulting Teddy Atlas niece, then I would say he doesn't get in. There's just something about child molestation that riles people up.

[ross]

So according to some people Pacquiao is without a doubt guilty because he refused to take a drug test.

Yes.

Its the same as refusing a breath test if stopped by the police. Refusing to give a sample in athletics or missing an arranged test is also punishable.