In the first Pacquiao-Mayweather negotiation, there was a disagreement with regards to the timing of the blood test. Although my belief is that Floyd did not want to fight Manny and that Manny just did not want to give in to Floyd's demand, I was disappointed with the shit excuses that they came up with. I had wished that Manny called in Mayweather's bluff.
Fast forward to the second negotiation. Pacquiao agreed to the drug test demand of Mayweather. But Floyd did not call Manny's bluff. Why is that? If, as one poster here said, that the gap between the two negotiations gave Manny time to clean his system, then shouldn't that be an easy fight for Mayweather? That would be a great opportunity for Floyd to prove his accusation. When he beats Manny to a pulp, this will be an excellent argument that Manny lost because he has no drugs in his system. But Floyd did not want to fight Manny or call his bluff (probably because he did not think Manny is bluffing). Floyd came up with a shit excuse that he is going on vacation! FLOYD WALKED AWAY FROM AN EASY FIGHT WITH MILLIONS AT STAKE TO GO ON VACATION!!!
So, my assumption is that Floyd really did not want to fight Manny and did not believe that Manny will be any different 'with or without the drugs in his system'. The accuser does not believe his own accusation.
If Manny gets his strenght from some drugs, then he must be crazy to fight Mayweather (a top caliber P4P boxer) without those drugs and be exposed.
My conclusion: Pacquiao is 'clean' until proven otherwise.
Bookmarks