I do find it funny how people are down on the Super Six because the best of the division are fighting the best while people are commending Bute for fighting no ones in his backyard and they are down on if Bute would join the super 6 just as they were saying months before that the Super 6 would have been better if Bute joined.
Maybe the super six has proven how hard it is to get the best in the division to fight each other in other division and even when contracts are agreed upon things fall apart.
In my opinion the Super Six was a good idea and an experiment. And people say that an elimination tournament would have been better.
But elimination tournaments really depend on the match making as one person could have an easier fight than the other, i think they want to determine who is the best having fought every 'best' in that division. But thats very difficult.
I don't even think the way they have done the super six was a bad idea except one, there was one thing that they should have changed. Majorly.
This whole decision is a point, knockout is three points etc.
Cause it encourages knockouts but not everyone in this tournament is a knockout artist and their style isn't based around it. So that means if one person gets a knockout and the rest go to decision if two other fights happen in decision the one who got the knockout is still ahead.
A better scoring strategy, is when you win you gain 2 points, when you lose, you lose one point. Which would make the score. Ward 4, Dirrell 2, Abraham 1, Froch 1, Kessler 0, Green -1.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks