cheating

[erics44]

anyway i think everyone is missing the point

No, your missing the point.

does it matter which is worse?

Yes, absolutely it does. If you take steroids then your taking illegal steps to better your prospects. If you load your gloves, it's done in one simple step. It's a cheaper than cheap shot.

even if its miles worse the drugs cheats still cheated and they are loved

I can only assume this relates to fighters who haven't been properly convicted Mosley/ Jones Jnr etc...?

its easier to invisage plaster in a glove and the extra damage that it can do, its hard to ever tell how much extra drugs can give a fighter, i dont think you can really compare the two but they are both cheating

Yep, your missing the point again. It's not directly about damage, it's about the measure of illicit short-cuts taken to inflict extra damage.

whom hates margs for cheating and loves hollyfield?

Again, this relates to the balance between accusations and actual convictions.

Boxing could and should do a lot more to enforce anti-doping but regardless, the apparent lack of competence in boxing's anti-doping regime unfortunately cannot rightfully qualify the likes of me & you to judge in it's absence.

does it matter whether its a cheap shot or an expensive way to, improve your prospects?

dude common

its you who is missing the point

drug cheats are cheats, you cant exactly evaluate the advantage it gives you, but you get a big advantage

is it worse than loaded gloves? maybe maybe not, but its still a massive advantage in a fight

I actually can't think of the last time I neg repped someone

Your a proper weirdo mate, you need clinical help.

your pretty sad dude

you always neg someone when they beat you in an argument?