How High Can Pac Go?

[UKPH]

Anggulo? Lol maybe pirog. martinez,berto dangerous to me @ no catch i cant see Bradley winning @ 147 with pac.

[:::PSL:::]

Anggulo? Lol maybe pirog. martinez,berto dangerous to me @ no catch i cant see Bradley winning @ 147 with pac.

Yep. Bradley looked pretty mediore at 147.

[Kel]

160 has to be the absolute limit. I think he could beat Martinez, I really do.

[milmascaras1]

anyone who doesn't think timothy bradley would give pacquiao hell at 140 is just nuthugging it to the extreme or doesn't know much about boxing. when was the last time pacquiao faced a younger, in his prime, fast boxer like bradley? again, for those of you who are offended by what i'm saying, relax, these are not racial comments. it's just that i don't see that pacquiao is so much more superior in skills than everybody else.

when was the last time pacquiao fought a grade A boxer with skills like bradley? the last time pacquiao fought a good boxer was when he beat barrera a second time. by that time, barrera was well past his prime and besides, pacquiao had already thrashed him a few years earlier. anyone who thinks bradley would be an easy fight for pacquiao just doesn't know anything about boxing. bradley is a very underrated boxer with great hand speed, movement and ring generalship. i will guarantee one thing, if pacquiao does beat bradley it's going to be alot more difficult a fight than most people think.

not taking anything away from pacquiao's last few victories but he fought either very slow (margarito), reluctant (clottey), weight drained (oscar) or ruined (cotto) fighters. everyone of these guys were not right that's why roach picked these fights. again, i do think roach has cherrypicked pacquiao's opponents in recent years and i would be very surprised if he picks a young, live, in his prime one.

[Julius Rain]

anyone who doesn't think timothy bradley would give pacquiao hell at 140 is just nuthugging it to the extreme or doesn't know much about boxing. when was the last time pacquiao faced a younger, in his prime, fast boxer like bradley? again, for those of you who are offended by what i'm saying, relax, these are not racial comments. it's just that i don't see that pacquiao is so much more superior in skills than everybody else.

when was the last time pacquiao fought a grade A boxer with skills like bradley? the last time pacquiao fought a good boxer was when he beat barrera a second time. by that time, barrera was well past his prime and besides, pacquiao had already thrashed him a few years earlier. anyone who thinks bradley would be an easy fight for pacquiao just doesn't know anything about boxing. bradley is a very underrated boxer with great hand speed, movement and ring generalship. i will guarantee one thing, if pacquiao does beat bradley it's going to be alot more difficult a fight than most people think.

not taking anything away from pacquiao's last few victories but he fought either very slow (margarito), reluctant (clottey), weight drained (oscar) or ruined (cotto) fighters. everyone of these guys were not right that's why roach picked these fights. again, i do think roach has cherrypicked pacquiao's opponents in recent years and i would be very surprised if he picks a young, live, in his prime one.

I'll mark this post. If ever pac vs bradley happens, I will get back to this post of yours.