Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstakes?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1314
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    my point is this, pacquiao is in his absolute prime right now. he can compete more effectively i believe, with fighters like berto and bradley because they are also in their prime. marquez, is too old for berto and mosley. however, as he's already proven, can give pacquiao an interesting fight like his first two. berto and bradley are just too young and in their prime for marquez. whereas pacquiao, while still in his prime, matches up well with marquez because marquez knows how to fight him. he's proven that but instead, pacquiao chooses an old mosley who definitely cannot be competitive anymore at the championship level.

    now tell me, explain to me if pacquiao is not cherry picking his opponents, why wasn't berto nor bradley or anybody as fast as pacquiao, chosen as his opponent? and please don't tell me that bullshit that they wouldn't sell enough ppv's! do you actually think the knowledgeable boxing public is going to shell out $54.95 to see a one sided beat down? pacquiao is a multi-millionaire many times over, surely he can go after a top fighter so that he can shut up his most ardent critics.

    and another thing, sergio martinez already said he would come down to 154 to challenge pacquiao for his jr. middleweight title but bob arum balked as usual. why? and please don't tell me pacquiao is too small for martinez. pacquiao was willing to beat up a slow, margarito for the jr. middleweight title at a catchweight so why can't he defend it with martinez as his opponent? i'll tell you why, it's because martinez would kill pacquiao and pacman knows it. he only wants fights where he has a big speed advantage. forget about the height and weight, speed kills and if your opponent happens to fight you at a catchweight and he's slow and past his prime, what a better opponent for pacquiao!!!
    You are turning this into a Pacquiao thread! I wanted to talk Marquez.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    because everything coming out of the pactardos mouths is pacquiao.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1314
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    What do you think is the biggest money fight for Marquez outside of Pacquiao?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    damn, that's a great question. there really aren't very many marketable fighters who would give marquez a really big payday. the closest opponent i would say is amir khan but it would never happen cause of the golden boy promotions/top rank dispute.

    i really can't name a big money fight for him right now!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1348
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    damn, that's a great question. there really aren't very many marketable fighters who would give marquez a really big payday. the closest opponent i would say is amir khan but it would never happen cause of the golden boy promotions/top rank dispute.

    i really can't name a big money fight for him right now!
    both Marquez and Khan are GBP fighters so nothing to do with top rank

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1451
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    That's why JMM-Khan will more likely to happen than Pac-JMM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1217
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    my point is this, pacquiao is in his absolute prime right now. he can compete more effectively i believe, with fighters like berto and bradley because they are also in their prime. marquez, is too old for berto and mosley. however, as he's already proven, can give pacquiao an interesting fight like his first two. berto and bradley are just too young and in their prime for marquez. whereas pacquiao, while still in his prime, matches up well with marquez because marquez knows how to fight him. he's proven that but instead, pacquiao chooses an old mosley who definitely cannot be competitive anymore at the championship level.

    now tell me, explain to me if pacquiao is not cherry picking his opponents, why wasn't berto nor bradley or anybody as fast as pacquiao, chosen as his opponent? and please don't tell me that bullshit that they wouldn't sell enough ppv's! do you actually think the knowledgeable boxing public is going to shell out $54.95 to see a one sided beat down? pacquiao is a multi-millionaire many times over, surely he can go after a top fighter so that he can shut up his most ardent critics.

    and another thing, sergio martinez already said he would come down to 154 to challenge pacquiao for his jr. middleweight title but bob arum balked as usual. why? and please don't tell me pacquiao is too small for martinez. pacquiao was willing to beat up a slow, margarito for the jr. middleweight title at a catchweight so why can't he defend it with martinez as his opponent? i'll tell you why, it's because martinez would kill pacquiao and pacman knows it. he only wants fights where he has a big speed advantage. forget about the height and weight, speed kills and if your opponent happens to fight you at a catchweight and he's slow and past his prime, what a better opponent for pacquiao!!!
    You are turning this into a Pacquiao thread! I wanted to talk Marquez.

    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    because everything coming out of the pactardos mouths is pacquiao.


    LMAO!!!!


    so Milmascaras is a pactardo ?

    hahahahhahaah

    hahahahahaahhaha

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2170
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez - who should he face if he doesn't win the Pacquiao sweepstak

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    my point is this, pacquiao is in his absolute prime right now. he can compete more effectively i believe, with fighters like berto and bradley because they are also in their prime. marquez, is too old for berto and mosley. however, as he's already proven, can give pacquiao an interesting fight like his first two. berto and bradley are just too young and in their prime for marquez. whereas pacquiao, while still in his prime, matches up well with marquez because marquez knows how to fight him. he's proven that but instead, pacquiao chooses an old mosley who definitely cannot be competitive anymore at the championship level.

    now tell me, explain to me if pacquiao is not cherry picking his opponents, why wasn't berto nor bradley or anybody as fast as pacquiao, chosen as his opponent? and please don't tell me that bullshit that they wouldn't sell enough ppv's! do you actually think the knowledgeable boxing public is going to shell out $54.95 to see a one sided beat down? pacquiao is a multi-millionaire many times over, surely he can go after a top fighter so that he can shut up his most ardent critics.

    and another thing, sergio martinez already said he would come down to 154 to challenge pacquiao for his jr. middleweight title but bob arum balked as usual. why? and please don't tell me pacquiao is too small for martinez. pacquiao was willing to beat up a slow, margarito for the jr. middleweight title at a catchweight so why can't he defend it with martinez as his opponent? i'll tell you why, it's because martinez would kill pacquiao and pacman knows it. he only wants fights where he has a big speed advantage. forget about the height and weight, speed kills and if your opponent happens to fight you at a catchweight and he's slow and past his prime, what a better opponent for pacquiao!!!
    You are turning this into a Pacquiao thread! I wanted to talk Marquez.
    What do you mean, he had two whole paragraphs about Marquez! read again...


    ooooops, actually, they don't mention Marquez at all.. My bad...
    ~ He thinks he's a Tornado,,,... F'ckn real Tornado is comin'...! ~Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-14-2012, 12:43 AM
  2. JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ VS MANNY PACQUIAO II
    By itouchpinoy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 11-22-2008, 10:58 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-16-2008, 08:06 AM
  4. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-01-2008, 10:48 PM
  5. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-15-2007, 11:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing