well KHAN sure knows how to RUN... Run Khan Run....that's what I learned tonight.

[Gandalf]

Mills Lane didn't chuck Tyson out the first bite because he bottled it. If I remember right, Lane took forever checking with other officials before letting it go on.

Anyway, according to Miles, any fighter should be allowed to attempt blatant elbows, and land them on the ref, without any action being taken. Deary deary me...

No, I didn't say that. I said a strong warning would have been perfectly justified. I also agreed that if Khan had been hit then a point deduction had some justification. I also agree with you that if Khan was hit and cut in some way as to discontinue the fight, then a DQ would be acceptable.

But it was nothing and therefore we should had a fight rather than the Cortez show.

These are not particularly outrageous viewpoints to have.

[Fenster]

Mills Lane didn't chuck Tyson out the first bite because he bottled it. If I remember right, Lane took forever checking with other officials before letting it go on.

Anyway, according to Miles, any fighter should be allowed to attempt blatant elbows, and land them on the ref, without any action being taken. Deary deary me...

No, I didn't say that. I said a strong warning would have been perfectly justified. I also agreed that if Khan had been hit then a point deduction had some justification. I also agree with you that if Khan was hit and cut in some way as to discontinue the fight, then a DQ would be acceptable.

But it was nothing and therefore we should had a fight rather than the Cortez show.

These are not particularly outrageous viewpoints to have.

What happens then if Cortez gives him a "strong warning" but he does it again, this time elbowing Khan, or Cortez, unconcious?

Cortez would have been at fault for not getting to grips with a blatant dirty elbower when he initially attempted the vicious assault.

(i was smiling whilst typing that out)

[Gandalf]

Mills Lane didn't chuck Tyson out the first bite because he bottled it. If I remember right, Lane took forever checking with other officials before letting it go on.

Anyway, according to Miles, any fighter should be allowed to attempt blatant elbows, and land them on the ref, without any action being taken. Deary deary me...

No, I didn't say that. I said a strong warning would have been perfectly justified. I also agreed that if Khan had been hit then a point deduction had some justification. I also agree with you that if Khan was hit and cut in some way as to discontinue the fight, then a DQ would be acceptable.

But it was nothing and therefore we should had a fight rather than the Cortez show.

These are not particularly outrageous viewpoints to have.

What happens then if Cortez gives him a "strong warning" but he does it again, this time elbowing Khan, or Cortez, unconcious?

Cortez would have been at fault for not getting to grips with a blatant dirty elbower when he initially attempted the vicious assault.

(i was smiling whilst typing that out)

That would be quite unlikely though. In fact, I think this debate has run its course.

[Fenster]

Yeah this debate is silly.

If you don't want points deducted don't attempt serious blatant fouls. Especailly don't elbow the ref. The end.

[ono]

Yeah this debate is silly.

If you don't want points deducted don't attempt serious blatant fouls. Especailly don't elbow the ref. The end.

Hahaha. This, x100,