Froch who can argue he is the best in the division the others can't.
Froch who can argue he is the best in the division the others can't.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Well it ain't Khan. Who's he fought? No title holders and no legit number one contenders.
Haye for a similar reason as khan altghough there are only 3 other fighters in his division that could test him and at least 2 don't want to fight him. The Audley fight was a shame.
Froch has beat genuine title holders and has defended agaist good opposition. He's fought the best in the division and narrowly lost to kessler away from home.
On paper you have to go with froch.
Has to be Khan for me. He dominated Paulie and beat Maidana. People said when he fought Paulie that he needed to fight a banger. Maidana is one of the hardest punchers in boxing and he passed the test. I think Froch can now claim to be Britain's best boxer at the minute though. Khan second and Haye 3rd. It's not been a great year for Haye. The Ruiz fight had to happen but Fraudley? It really was a shocking fight and kind of makes a mockery of the HW belt.
My vote goes to Khan.
He had one impressive performance against a top 10 JWW in Paulie and went on to beat big puncher Maidana ( top 5 JWW) in a good fight where he got tested but came back and proved himself.
Froch looked great against Abraham but his loss to Kessler earlier this year hurts him. ( i thought Kessler deserved the win, really close fight though)
i personal think froch beat kessler and along with his win against AA he probably should pip khan
however the scores went against him against kessler so youd probly have to say khan
Probably A Mere Con.
Honorable mentions: Burns, Hatton(yeah I know..) and Cleverly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks