Boxing topics that bring out the bias

[erics44]

It's okay to be bias as long as you give props to the opposing fighter whether or not he got his ass handed to him.

Give credit. Learn how to respect. Don't hate. Don't be a sore loser.

yep there is nothing wrong with being bias

the question is tho, which topics bring out the bias

my take is that the haye klit situation seems to be the best (or worst if you want to look at it that way) at stirring the feelings of the boxing fan

i think people really struggle to look at it objectively

[DaxxKahn]

It's okay to be bias as long as you give props to the opposing fighter whether or not he got his ass handed to him.

Give credit. Learn how to respect. Don't hate. Don't be a sore loser.

yep there is nothing wrong with being bias

the question is tho, which topics bring out the bias

my take is that the haye klit situation seems to be the best (or worst if you want to look at it that way) at stirring the feelings of the boxing fan

i think people really struggle to look at it objectively

In truth I think it can be any on going topic that has not result...Like mentioned Klitschko/Haye or PBF/Pacquiao...They just never seem to end and develope a tobloid like aura to them...So people pick sides and start slinging mud around etc....Would be different I guess if there was a debate and somehow there wa sa resolution or even if the fighters just moved on to something new instead of a constant BS negotiations and he said she said crap....Funny thing is these are supposed to be pro fighters yet it is all carried on like a soap opera

[iamasadlittleboy]

Anything where a fighter is popular will have a split, Mike Tyson being a great example, or where theirs some controversy that international boxing fans get a good sniff of. Just imagine if the internet was around in the 30's we'd have had so much fun with Carnera "useless big lump"/"Talented giant", Braddock "White collar champion"/"a title waiting to be taken" etcs.