Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1410
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Cris Arreola has nothing for Wlad. Sure Arreola can take a punch but at the same time you have to realize that now'a'days Vitali fights at a slower pace than Wlad and Wlad has a better arsenal of punches. Plus Arreola was resigned to just last the distance after the first half of the fight.

    You guys will see a whole new monster when he fights Chisora...it won't last long. Manny's going to have Wlad gunning for earlier more spectacular KO's and Wlad is very capable of delivering them given the state of the rest of the division.
    Haha what against the mighty Chisora? OOOOOOO I don't no about that. Jesus you are easily pleased mate he could come in the ring looking like a giant version of Pac he is fighting a 14 fight novice who hasn'tr even been further than 9 rounds.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    792
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1062
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?

    it comes from the fact the divison is seen as very weak and the bros are at the top, theres never been two brothers at the top of the heavyweight divison and they aren't goner fight eachother so they use there power to put in the contract that clause....untill someone comes in a knocks them off they'll have there way lol. funny how other fighters will bow down and taht the fights but our so called saviour david haye somehow can't sign and carry out a contract with them

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1199
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?

    I like the klits but yes this stipulation is just plain stupid, how did brewster not have to do it back in 04 when he beat wlad? I thought it was because vitali was in his retirement at the time but not the case.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3484
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?

    Has to be an ego thing or something because if you ever gave notice at the fights Wlad was stopped and Vitali was present he went out of control....I remember him having to be held back when Wlad fell to Sanders....Maybe they just want to be able to say you beat one of us but you did not beat the Klitschko name?.......Who knows...

    As for those who think it is a bullshit stipulation well I agree to that on a somewhat limited basis ....Should it always be? No but hey only one way to change it right? Beat the brothers....IMO though I am a fan of them Vitili will fall first if we ever get a decent HW willing to trade and make him fight their fight....Wlad is just too sound scientifically....He keeps to his gameplan....I think Wlad is the harder hitter as well....Vitali has the higher KO% but he is more on volume while Wlad is just a fucking jackhammer.....

    In truth I don't understand the hate for him

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1457
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why the fuck do all fighters who fight either Klit have to fight the other one?

    Because they are the kings of negotiating to suit themselves and if they don't get exactly what they want, when they want it, fights just don't happen.

    I agree that champions should have more of a say than any contender when contracts are written but the Klits just take the piss. Could you really imagine Muhammad Ali for example saying to Joe Frazier, "right if you beat me you have to fight George Foreman straight after, otherwise you are in breach of our contract"??

    What a load of Bollocks!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. David Haye explains why the Klit fight hasn't gone ahead
    By boxingbantz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-02-2010, 12:40 PM
  2. Manny Steward:Haye Just talks alot, wont fight Klit Bros
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-02-2010, 10:31 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-31-2010, 04:42 PM
  4. Klit vs. Austin fight
    By The Shadow in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-12-2007, 05:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing