Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1424
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

    I'm not sure why this thread was started because I see no problem with what we have now.

    We have Diamond Champions, Super Champions, Interim Champions, Silver Champions, Champion Emeritus, Champions "In Recess" and of course our normal run of the mill regular champion. In some cases we have more than one interim champion but they unify their interim titles so that isn't a problem. We also have numerous governing bodies with numerous champions in their governing body. I think by giving everyone a belt it makes them feel happier. Kinda like in pre-school, when everyone gets a medal regardless of where you finish in the race. I think it's nice. We should start handing out belts to the loser too!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I'm not sure why this thread was started because I see no problem with what we have now.

    We have Diamond Champions, Super Champions, Interim Champions, Silver Champions, Champion Emeritus, Champions "In Recess" and of course our normal run of the mill regular champion. In some cases we have more than one interim champion but they unify their interim titles so that isn't a problem. We also have numerous governing bodies with numerous champions in their governing body. I think by giving everyone a belt it makes them feel happier. Kinda like in pre-school, when everyone gets a medal regardless of where you finish in the race. I think it's nice. We should start handing out belts to the loser too!
    A belt with a wooden spoon on it would be brilliant!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2851
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

    I would have many different weight classes and many interim belts so that every fight became a "special championship event."
    Also I would let old inactive boxers hold onto their belts for many years without even fighting in that weight class.

    I would sell belts. When I ran out of belt ideas I would just buy another sanctioning body and work from several angles to get the unification fights I wanted.

    I would appoint the worst judges and when they did a terrible job I would reward them with more top tier fights. Nepotism would be the only way I did things. A shitty job done by someone with mob ties or my cousin is much better than competency, because I decide who fights and wins anyway.

    I would have a stable of known, albeit aging fighters, and I would round robin them throughout the years against each other so that we could all keep the money between us!
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

    Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer View Post
    I would have many different weight classes and many interim belts so that every fight became a "special championship event."
    Also I would let old inactive boxers hold onto their belts for many years without even fighting in that weight class.

    I would sell belts. When I ran out of belt ideas I would just buy another sanctioning body and work from several angles to get the unification fights I wanted.

    I would appoint the worst judges and when they did a terrible job I would reward them with more top tier fights. Nepotism would be the only way I did things. A shitty job done by someone with mob ties or my cousin is much better than competency, because I decide who fights and wins anyway.

    I would have a stable of known, albeit aging fighters, and I would round robin them throughout the years against each other so that we could all keep the money between us!
    ....So what you are saying is you would not change a thing from the way things are now

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,575
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1233
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

    I'd use an independent ranking (Ring) to insure a little more credibility.
    Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    925
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VictorCharlie View Post
    I'd use an independent ranking (Ring) to insure a little more credibility.
    No one is ever independent. Not forever anyway.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4177
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If you were in charge of a sanctioning body how would you run your rating system?

    In the next world
    Imagine a tiered ladder system in each weight like football, you get the boot off your own ladder you go down into B division or C. Top man goes up next ladder or fights for the place with bottom man off the next ladder, whatever works best to suit the numbers of fighters odds or evens. Everyone either fights the man above them or the one below them, no escape no excuses: top money and points at the top lower money and points at the bottom.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Saddoboxing Sanctioning body
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 03-21-2009, 06:55 PM
  2. Saddoboxing Sanctioning Body Committee sign up
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 01:41 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-23-2008, 11:17 AM
  4. New MMA sanctioning body-thoughts?>
    By El Gamo in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-17-2007, 10:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing