We all blast these sanctioning bodies because of the way their rating system is set up and in truth some are just outright criminal but if you were in charge of the ratings how would you have them set up?

Me I would of course have the Champion- Then the minor belt holder EG-

WBO-

Champion-

#1- NABO title holder
#2-
#3-

And so on I would rank my fighters on not who they beat in terms of skill opion wise but use actual win loss ratios on the opp they beat....

EG- A guy who beats 15 fighters with records under 60%, 50% etc is not getting ranked as high as the guy who has beaten only 4 fighters in a rtow but those 4 fighters have a combined 85% win ration between them...I know that santioning bodies should or have tried similar methods but they do not seem to enforce them well.....I know there would be other factors I would need to think about but as a Base on how I come up with the opinion is the way I mentioned above..

Anoy other opps on how you would run your rating system