I agree mostly with Elterrible. Sorry guys but if you think beating a fighter like Arias means that Barrera will be able to turn back the clock and beat a top fighter at 140 then I think you're clutching at straws. The argument will never be answered until he steps up his opposition, but I see him much like Nate Campbell in this instance. Great fighter at a lower weight, but little chance when he steps up against younger, faster and much better opposition. People will use the Khan excuse all day, but much like Bradley-Campbell, my belief is that the cut saved him, and gave him an excuse for why he didn't perform. Does anyone here truly believe that if he wasn't cut against Khan he'd have won that fight?