Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    914
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    There is simply no way in hell that anyone can justify to me that Saul Alvarez (Welterweight) vs Matthew Hatton (Welterweight) should have a fight sanctioned for the WBC LM Belt. Its plain ridiculous.

    Its like some athletics board putting out a 100m championship and letting a couple of 200m or 400m race for it when clearly there are plenty of racers at 100m that have been overlooked.

    I mean, MATTHEW HATTON, fighting for a Light Middleweight World Title, can anyone possibly take that seriosuly. This shit is just spoiling a sport I really really love. This should be Angulo vs Ryan Rhodes or Erislandy Lara vs vanes Martirosyan, as examples. Come on.

    Eric, surely you don't believe yourself on this one. And for me, Pacquiao absolutely should not have been fighting for the LM title, no way, and neither should Margarito. That was a farce and just an organisation GIVING Pacquiao another title to stroke his ego.....
    Spot on.

    There is no point explaining sense and reasoning to erics44 mate, he just doesn't seem to grasp it.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    There is simply no way in hell that anyone can justify to me that Saul Alvarez (Welterweight) vs Matthew Hatton (Welterweight) should have a fight sanctioned for the WBC LM Belt. Its plain ridiculous.

    Its like some athletics board putting out a 100m championship and letting a couple of 200m or 400m race for it when clearly there are plenty of racers at 100m that have been overlooked.

    I mean, MATTHEW HATTON, fighting for a Light Middleweight World Title, can anyone possibly take that seriosuly. This shit is just spoiling a sport I really really love. This should be Angulo vs Ryan Rhodes or Erislandy Lara vs vanes Martirosyan, as examples. Come on.

    Eric, surely you don't believe yourself on this one. And for me, Pacquiao absolutely should not have been fighting for the LM title, no way, and neither should Margarito. That was a farce and just an organisation GIVING Pacquiao another title to stroke his ego.....
    Spot on.

    There is no point explaining sense and reasoning to erics44 mate, he just doesn't seem to grasp it.
    you crack me up
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North of South
    Posts
    2,693
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    There is simply no way in hell that anyone can justify to me that Saul Alvarez (Welterweight) vs Matthew Hatton (Welterweight) should have a fight sanctioned for the WBC LM Belt. Its plain ridiculous.

    Its like some athletics board putting out a 100m championship and letting a couple of 200m or 400m race for it when clearly there are plenty of racers at 100m that have been overlooked.

    I mean, MATTHEW HATTON, fighting for a Light Middleweight World Title, can anyone possibly take that seriosuly. This shit is just spoiling a sport I really really love. This should be Angulo vs Ryan Rhodes or Erislandy Lara vs vanes Martirosyan, as examples. Come on.

    Eric, surely you don't believe yourself on this one. And for me, Pacquiao absolutely should not have been fighting for the LM title, no way, and neither should Margarito. That was a farce and just an organisation GIVING Pacquiao another title to stroke his ego.....
    Spot on.

    There is no point explaining sense and reasoning to erics44 mate, he just doesn't seem to grasp it.
    you crack me up
    Sometimes i think your on crack


    TheMacMagician, your spot on, neither of these deserves a shot at a title when neither have fought a contender within that division, how can that be sane Im taking nothing away from either fighter, but it's plain stupid !
    Hidden Content SADDO'S FIGHT NIGHT RD4 CHAMPION, TAKING ON ALL COMERS ! Hidden Content

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

    Quote Originally Posted by Mattyhitman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    There is simply no way in hell that anyone can justify to me that Saul Alvarez (Welterweight) vs Matthew Hatton (Welterweight) should have a fight sanctioned for the WBC LM Belt. Its plain ridiculous.

    Its like some athletics board putting out a 100m championship and letting a couple of 200m or 400m race for it when clearly there are plenty of racers at 100m that have been overlooked.

    I mean, MATTHEW HATTON, fighting for a Light Middleweight World Title, can anyone possibly take that seriosuly. This shit is just spoiling a sport I really really love. This should be Angulo vs Ryan Rhodes or Erislandy Lara vs vanes Martirosyan, as examples. Come on.

    Eric, surely you don't believe yourself on this one. And for me, Pacquiao absolutely should not have been fighting for the LM title, no way, and neither should Margarito. That was a farce and just an organisation GIVING Pacquiao another title to stroke his ego.....
    Spot on.

    There is no point explaining sense and reasoning to erics44 mate, he just doesn't seem to grasp it.
    you crack me up
    Sometimes i think your on crack


    TheMacMagician, your spot on, neither of these deserves a shot at a title when neither have fought a contender within that division, how can that be sane Im taking nothing away from either fighter, but it's plain stupid !
    which contender has ryan rhodes fought recently?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    918
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattyhitman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    There is simply no way in hell that anyone can justify to me that Saul Alvarez (Welterweight) vs Matthew Hatton (Welterweight) should have a fight sanctioned for the WBC LM Belt. Its plain ridiculous.

    Its like some athletics board putting out a 100m championship and letting a couple of 200m or 400m race for it when clearly there are plenty of racers at 100m that have been overlooked.

    I mean, MATTHEW HATTON, fighting for a Light Middleweight World Title, can anyone possibly take that seriosuly. This shit is just spoiling a sport I really really love. This should be Angulo vs Ryan Rhodes or Erislandy Lara vs vanes Martirosyan, as examples. Come on.

    Eric, surely you don't believe yourself on this one. And for me, Pacquiao absolutely should not have been fighting for the LM title, no way, and neither should Margarito. That was a farce and just an organisation GIVING Pacquiao another title to stroke his ego.....
    Spot on.

    There is no point explaining sense and reasoning to erics44 mate, he just doesn't seem to grasp it.
    you crack me up
    Sometimes i think your on crack


    TheMacMagician, your spot on, neither of these deserves a shot at a title when neither have fought a contender within that division, how can that be sane Im taking nothing away from either fighter, but it's plain stupid !
    which contender has ryan rhodes fought recently?
    Jamie Moore was mandatory for a shot at Martinez, Rhodes then smashed Moore, so should have got his shot. But didn't and was cast aside, probably where he'll stay. He mustn't want it as far as I'm concerned, otherwise he'd be making atleast a little noise, and he doesn't even do that..........

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

    Boxing should call these soup fights pre-title bout eliminators and then call unified fights as semi-finals and make the winner a mandatory fight for Linear Title before declaring the winner World Champion.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Saul Alvarez
    By bradlee180 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-20-2021, 08:48 PM
  2. Saul Alvarez v Kell Brook
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-19-2010, 04:13 PM
  3. Saul Alvarez... PPV Material?
    By ArawakWarria in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-19-2010, 01:03 AM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-13-2007, 04:26 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2006, 02:07 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing