Saul Alvarez vs Matthew Hatton for the WBC Light Middleweight title

[TheMacMagician]

There is simply no way in hell that anyone can justify to me that Saul Alvarez (Welterweight) vs Matthew Hatton (Welterweight) should have a fight sanctioned for the WBC LM Belt. Its plain ridiculous.

Its like some athletics board putting out a 100m championship and letting a couple of 200m or 400m race for it when clearly there are plenty of racers at 100m that have been overlooked.

I mean, MATTHEW HATTON, fighting for a Light Middleweight World Title, can anyone possibly take that seriosuly. This shit is just spoiling a sport I really really love. This should be Angulo vs Ryan Rhodes or Erislandy Lara vs vanes Martirosyan, as examples. Come on.

Eric, surely you don't believe yourself on this one. And for me, Pacquiao absolutely should not have been fighting for the LM title, no way, and neither should Margarito. That was a farce and just an organisation GIVING Pacquiao another title to stroke his ego.....

Spot on.

There is no point explaining sense and reasoning to erics44 mate, he just doesn't seem to grasp it.

you crack me up

Sometimes i think your on crack


TheMacMagician, your spot on, neither of these deserves a shot at a title when neither have fought a contender within that division, how can that be sane Im taking nothing away from either fighter, but it's plain stupid !

which contender has ryan rhodes fought recently?

Jamie Moore was mandatory for a shot at Martinez, Rhodes then smashed Moore, so should have got his shot. But didn't and was cast aside, probably where he'll stay. He mustn't want it as far as I'm concerned, otherwise he'd be making atleast a little noise, and he doesn't even do that..........