Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Pacquiao and the ped issue

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1477
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao and the ped issue

    Quote Originally Posted by paddy448 View Post
    First off i apolagise because i no this thread has been done to death so many times already. But here we are yet again.

    Ok, the reason i just brought this up again is because obviously its such a hot topic. But the real reason is ive been watching Pacquiaos past dust ups down at the lighter weights against the marquee names such as morales, barrera and marquez. And to be honest to this day i feel hes the same fighter, same style,same tenacity, but just more polished (hence the way he doesnt get as wreckless when he feels he has someone hurt) and of corse this is an improvement, but this is understood because of his work with the seems to be great coach Freddie Roach over time.

    Heres where the so called p.e.ds come in. If u look at compubox stats (questionable i no) his punch output in the higher weights (lightweight plus) is higher than his lower weight reign (superfeather and below). And yeah it does seem very strange how a Pacman alot heavier can have higher output than a lowerweight Pacman and even still carry his powerup in weight and even still seem to improve on that power. When people see this (and yes i have been one of them) this cannot be, this man MUST be taking something.

    My own personal thoughts on the matter after some research, hence my sister bein a sports nutritionist, and having more insight onto the moving up in weight and carrying the power and speed at the same time and even improving on this are as follows: Pacquiao must have been starving himself at some point during training camp at the lighterweights and it would of to a degree limited his true potential as a fighter. And where hes moved up thru the weights his overall food intake and natural growth has increased his performance as a fighter (hence the greater compubox stats).This is very feasable, but not all fighters are the same in this respect.

    In closing this analogy i would like to finish up saying that i really, truly believe we are dealing with a truly special once in a lifetime fighter in Manny Pacquiao.And that im not 100% sure but pretty certain that what this man has done and is continuing to do is biologically feasable, and i do think he is free of any p.e.d.s and all his work is natural and God given.

    Once again apolagies too anybody who is sick to death of this topic, i just wanted to give my 2 cents on the matter.
    I am neither a pacfan nor a pachater...

    "Opinions" and "Theories" are just that. Why keeping starting new threads on an issue that has been "done to Death" as you said? Why not keep it all in one or two threads.

    [quote]No need to apologize, you have all the right to express your opinion in here. The last I heard this is still a boxing forum and Pacquiao is a boxer. For those who are already sick and tired of this issue there are several other threads that they can read instead. If they decide to open up this thread, then they're interested in it.

    I read most of the threads here (don't comment on most as my post count shows) but why spread the same questions and responses on the same issue out over a half dozen threads or more when 2 would do? Gets a little tiring having to jump all over the place, simply because some one wants to start a new thread with their name as the first poster.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    852
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao and the ped issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    I read most of the threads here (don't comment on most as my post count shows) but why spread the same questions and responses on the same issue out over a half dozen threads or more when 2 would do? Gets a little tiring having to jump all over the place, simply because some one wants to start a new thread with their name as the first poster.
    I don't think the issues brought up by paddy448 with regards to the Ped controversy had been raised before. Has it?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-10-2010, 10:08 AM
  2. My view on the Pacquiao/Mayweather issue.....
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-11-2010, 07:36 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-30-2007, 05:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing