Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 42

Thread: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    792
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    For me if there was a second fight someone would have explaint to Formane that there are the so cald score cards and that he must not go inside In this case Ali would not have a chance.
    It is astounding how unstable is the psychik of Forman

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trueno View Post
    George claimed that Ali ruined him psychologically in that documentary where Frazier, Ali, Holmes, Norton and George sat together and broke bread.
    Said he attributed the losses to Young etc. to Ali's demolition of his psyche
    Champions Forever. Watched it just last week actually.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    does anyone know what the judges scorecards were b4 the 8th round KO?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Just found the 'Scorecards in rounds':

    Zach Clayton 4-2-1 Ali
    Nourridine Adalla 3-0-4 Ali
    James Taylor 4-1-2 Ali


    UD for Ali WTF?!
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Just found the 'Scorecards in rounds':

    Zach Clayton 4-2-1 Ali
    Nourridine Adalla 3-0-4 Ali
    James Taylor 4-1-2 Ali


    UD for Ali WTF?!
    Good find!

    A lot of Formans shots were hitting arms and gloves but I am supprised.

    Will have to score the fight myself to see how I would have had it.
    Balls

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trueno View Post
    George claimed that Ali ruined him psychologically in that documentary where Frazier, Ali, Holmes, Norton and George sat together and broke bread.
    Said he attributed the losses to Young etc. to Ali's demolition of his psyche
    Champions Forever. Watched it just last week actually.
    Nice one buddy, that's the one.
    091

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    792
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    This is no surprise for me. When i am watching old Ali's fights it's all the time Ali did this Ali did that and actually he didn't do anything I always turn the sound off!
    I don't want to start talking about the corrupted swines in boxing! I am getting angry!

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by nikola_ganchev View Post
    This is no surprise for me. When i am watching old Ali's fights it's all the time Ali did this Ali did that and actually he didn't do anything I always turn the sound off!
    I don't want to start talking about the corrupted swines in boxing! I am getting angry!
    Agreed a lot of the old Ali fights were boring like Spinks fight but he was old and had very little left.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    -Ali beat Foreman in 1974

    -Foreman then took an entire year off

    -On the comeback trail, Foreman beat Ron Lyle and Joe Frazier in 1976.

    -When the public was finally demanding a rematch, Ali took a 3rd fight against Ken Norton instead.

    -After the Norton fight, Ali announced his retirement (this retirement would only last 8 months)

    -Foreman went on to fight Jimmy Young and lost, and retired.

    - Ali came back out of retirement and fought several more times and went in and out of retirement a couple more times.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    I just watched Round 1 again and a lot of the damage in that fight took place there and then. Ali hit George several times with left/right combinations and his right hand leads had George confused. Nobody had done that to George before. George was puffy around the left eye by round 2, he look bewildered. Ali knew he had his man early on in the fight, it was only a matter of time. George only had one basic plan and that was to load up and swing from the bleechers, by round 8 Foreman's tank was empty.
    George states he was psychologically damaged after the Ali fight, Ali was never the same either after the Thriller In Manilla. Perhaps it's best we didn't see them go at it again.
    How would Holmes have handled a 30 year old more experienced big George in 1979?
    Foreman was a beast, tamed by one of the greatest ring tacticians of all time.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I just watched Round 1 again and a lot of the damage in that fight took place there and then. Ali hit George several times with left/right combinations and his right hand leads had George confused. Nobody had done that to George before. George was puffy around the left eye by round 2, he look bewildered. Ali knew he had his man early on in the fight, it was only a matter of time. George only had one basic plan and that was to load up and swing from the bleechers, by round 8 Foreman's tank was empty.
    George states he was psychologically damaged after the Ali fight, Ali was never the same either after the Thriller In Manilla. Perhaps it's best we didn't see them go at it again.
    How would Holmes have handled a 30 year old more experienced big George in 1979?
    Foreman was a beast, tamed by one of the greatest ring tacticians of all time.
    Good question about George v Holmes that would be really interesting. I would go with Holmes.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I just watched Round 1 again and a lot of the damage in that fight took place there and then. Ali hit George several times with left/right combinations and his right hand leads had George confused. Nobody had done that to George before. George was puffy around the left eye by round 2, he look bewildered. Ali knew he had his man early on in the fight, it was only a matter of time. George only had one basic plan and that was to load up and swing from the bleechers, by round 8 Foreman's tank was empty.
    George states he was psychologically damaged after the Ali fight, Ali was never the same either after the Thriller In Manilla. Perhaps it's best we didn't see them go at it again.
    How would Holmes have handled a 30 year old more experienced big George in 1979?
    Foreman was a beast, tamed by one of the greatest ring tacticians of all time.
    Good question about George v Holmes that would be really interesting. I would go with Holmes.
    That is my all time favorite fantasy match up. I go with Holmes too. Would of done his legacy the world of good.

    I think Holmes beats all those guys from the 60's/ 70's.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Saddo View Post
    I'm sure George stated it never happened because he didn't want it to... not really sure what version of george said that... the real one or the PR one
    \
    George did say that more then once...He went into a state of depression after the fight...He siad he lost his conmfidence after ward and when he lost to Young he said he really thought he would never fight again
    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I just watched Round 1 again and a lot of the damage in that fight took place there and then. Ali hit George several times with left/right combinations and his right hand leads had George confused. Nobody had done that to George before. George was puffy around the left eye by round 2, he look bewildered. Ali knew he had his man early on in the fight, it was only a matter of time. George only had one basic plan and that was to load up and swing from the bleechers, by round 8 Foreman's tank was empty.
    George states he was psychologically damaged after the Ali fight, Ali was never the same either after the Thriller In Manilla. Perhaps it's best we didn't see them go at it again.
    How would Holmes have handled a 30 year old more experienced big George in 1979?
    Foreman was a beast, tamed by one of the greatest ring tacticians of all time.
    Good question about George v Holmes that would be really interesting. I would go with Holmes.
    That is my all time favorite fantasy match up. I go with Holmes too. Would of done his legacy the world of good.

    I think Holmes beats all those guys from the 60's/ 70's.
    Not Ali but may be Frazier, now that would be a classic Holmes v Frazier.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Main Reason there was no Ali-Foreman II?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I just watched Round 1 again and a lot of the damage in that fight took place there and then. Ali hit George several times with left/right combinations and his right hand leads had George confused. Nobody had done that to George before. George was puffy around the left eye by round 2, he look bewildered. Ali knew he had his man early on in the fight, it was only a matter of time. George only had one basic plan and that was to load up and swing from the bleechers, by round 8 Foreman's tank was empty.
    George states he was psychologically damaged after the Ali fight, Ali was never the same either after the Thriller In Manilla. Perhaps it's best we didn't see them go at it again.
    How would Holmes have handled a 30 year old more experienced big George in 1979?
    Foreman was a beast, tamed by one of the greatest ring tacticians of all time.
    Good question about George v Holmes that would be really interesting. I would go with Holmes.
    That is my all time favorite fantasy match up. I go with Holmes too. Would of done his legacy the world of good.

    I think Holmes beats all those guys from the 60's/ 70's.
    Not Ali but may be Frazier, now that would be a classic Holmes v Frazier.
    I think Frazier gives Holmes as much trouble as he gave ALI, Holmes probably would have outboxed big George. Holmes possessed one of the best jabs in boxing history, it would only be a matter of staying away from Foreman's big shots. (easier said than done) A 30 yr old experienced big George would have been a formidable foe, but Holmes by decision. Frazier would be a nightmare for Holmes, all those angles, all that movement and that left hook!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Another reason belts don't mean anything
    By MMASUX in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-02-2010, 03:10 AM
  2. Yet another reason to like JML
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 02:19 AM
  3. Reason #468 why the WBC is Corrupt
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-01-2008, 07:55 AM
  4. Replies: 63
    Last Post: 03-13-2008, 12:18 PM
  5. 70's Foreman VS 90's Foreman
    By JT Rock in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 04:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing