Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Ibo - computerized ranking

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Ibo - computerized ranking

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Since they started this, I've always thought the IBO to be the best sanctioning body even if they aren't high profile. It's too bad the rest of the boxing world doesn't come around on this, it's pretty sad we recognize guys as title holders even though their belts are given to them by blatantly corrupt organizations. Oh well. The rankings aren't perfect but I think their better then boxrec's computerized rankings.
    Good enough for me...Wlad is the IBO Heavyweight champ so at least they've got that right

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1422
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ibo - computerized ranking

    Johnny & Amat, CC guys. Seriously, I've felt the same way for a long time now. I would like to see IBO gain more prominence. Either them or Boxrec

    Lyle, lol.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    992
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ibo - computerized ranking

    I give it another 2 or 3 years before it becomes another major world title like the other 4. Just think guys we'll then have 5 major world titles and who knows the IBO will start having super champs, emritus champs, Super Duper Champs, interim champs, etc.

    Ain't that exciting?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1776
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ibo - computerized ranking

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Since they started this, I've always thought the IBO to be the best sanctioning body even if they aren't high profile. It's too bad the rest of the boxing world doesn't come around on this, it's pretty sad we recognize guys as title holders even though their belts are given to them by blatantly corrupt organizations. Oh well. The rankings aren't perfect but I think their better then boxrec's computerized rankings.
    Good enough for me...Wlad is the IBO Heavyweight champ so at least they've got that right
    vitali was destroy wlad

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1465
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ibo - computerized ranking

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Since they started this, I've always thought the IBO to be the best sanctioning body even if they aren't high profile. It's too bad the rest of the boxing world doesn't come around on this, it's pretty sad we recognize guys as title holders even though their belts are given to them by blatantly corrupt organizations. Oh well. The rankings aren't perfect but I think their better then boxrec's computerized rankings.
    Good enough for me...Wlad is the IBO Heavyweight champ so at least they've got that right
    Agreed yes they have. Also when Ricky Hatton was clearly 140lbs champ they were the only one that recognised him as champion going into the Pac fight. The Ring too but they are a magazine not a governing body!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,873
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ibo - computerized ranking

    Quote Originally Posted by rjj tszyu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Since they started this, I've always thought the IBO to be the best sanctioning body even if they aren't high profile. It's too bad the rest of the boxing world doesn't come around on this, it's pretty sad we recognize guys as title holders even though their belts are given to them by blatantly corrupt organizations. Oh well. The rankings aren't perfect but I think their better then boxrec's computerized rankings.
    Good enough for me...Wlad is the IBO Heavyweight champ so at least they've got that right
    Agreed yes they have. Also when Ricky Hatton was clearly 140lbs champ they were the only one that recognised him as champion going into the Pac fight. The Ring too but they are a magazine not a governing body!

    Just when I was starting to believe in IBO.......

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How does the P4P ranking look now?
    By Julius Rain in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 05:28 AM
  2. Ranking thread
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-15-2009, 02:12 AM
  3. i think we should have a new p4p ranking(wacko help)
    By babyboNe in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-12-2007, 06:36 AM
  4. Valuev's new ranking..
    By landmine950 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-25-2007, 01:11 AM
  5. How u get ur ranking up???
    By Billy_TNT_Carnes in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2006, 03:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing