Nowhere close to the top 100 of all time. That's about it.
Nowhere close to the top 100 of all time. That's about it.
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
I am absolutely convinced that he is the 154th best boxer of all time.
well caparison as being the GUY that beat the GUY, buster douglas was that guy, but he sucked, duran was that guy but he is one of the greats, so what i am saying is, is tarver just a guy that sucks that beat the guy, or is he the guy that beat the guy and goes down ranked, at least at lhw, but i see majority agree he doesn't
Do you think he's a borderline HOF candidate Mick?
I think a lot of people hate on him and so underestimate him. But he was a slick, tough fighter in his prime. Avenged all of his losses, won world titles 3 times, never been stopped. Even gave Chad Dawson some decent tests at age 38 or something.
I think he's a good example of someone who came back from early adversity and carved out a successful career that looked very unlikely indeed a few years earlier.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks