Nobody said that it blew everything else out of the water did they (there's not much point in that... you get no where with tin foils)... I see you keep side stepping around what I said though.
I'll just take your inability to address the point by repeatedly saying "why say that! why say that?! weak weak weak!" as an admission that it was in irrelevant and retarded point to bring up and that you are ignorant of international languages, even at the broadest, simplest level.
I thought that this thread might turn interesting, but it has just become annoying. What on earth are you people arguing about? No way is it going to reach page 17 when I announce that I am leaving.
Last edited by AdamGB; 05-05-2011 at 06:02 PM. Reason: freudian slip: equals
I didn't literally think that you wore a tinfoil hat... I was using it as more of a derogatory term for a pseudo-activist who will sit on his PC and hammer out this and that about conspiracies and the man, but do nothing outside of that.
You raise a redundant and and ill informed 'point' about his name and wonder why people may start to dismiss other things you say and not take them seriously?
I can't really be bothered to have political discussions with somebody who isn't even informed enough to know that Arabs don't use the same letters that we do.
Again... I will take your side stepping of the issue 'weak weak' posts as an admission of your point's ignorances and pointlessness.
(if you raise weak points then expect 'weak' responses?)
How is it weak refuting evidence that tends to weaken your case?
And to debate someone you don't necessarily have to "blow everything else out of the water" but you discriminate facts, point out inconsistencies that gives a blow to your credibility, etc. You test someone's credibility on one thing that is false and that often leads to clearer thinking that a so-called "expert" has other notions that are without merit.![]()
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Because you were saying that the FBI website has spelt it differently as if it was somehow relevant to some conspiracy... when in actual fact it just highlighted your lack of knowledge regarding what you were trying to speak with authority about?
Honestly, I could try and go into your other points... but I doubt we'd get very far. You should be thankful that I've just educated you and now you know that not everybody uses the English Alphabet and how this may affect translations etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks