WTF is PBF demanding w/ those Blood Tests???

[marbleheadmaui]

You have no opinion on the matter but your still talking uneducated bollox about a subject you don't have a clue about. Nice one.

You're not big on logic are you? It is possible to hold positions more complex than "he's cheating" or "he's not."

[Hornfinger]

You have no opinion on the matter but your still talking uneducated bollox about a subject you don't have a clue about. Nice one.

You're not big on logic are you? It is possible to hold positions more complex than "he's cheating" or "he's not."

Your position is irrelavent IMO.

How many sports have you competed in where random testing was compulsory and could be done at any time? I'm willing to bet none. And I think that goes for everyone else other than me who have comented on this thread.

[fan johnny]

You have no opinion on the matter but your still talking uneducated bollox about a subject you don't have a clue about. Nice one.

You're not big on logic are you? It is possible to hold positions more complex than "he's cheating" or "he's not."

Your position is irrelavent IMO.

How many sports have you competed in where random testing was compulsory and could be done at any time? I'm willing to bet none. And I think that goes for everyone else other than me who have comented on this thread.

Your stated opinion is worthless. And you have no rational basis to back any of your statements. There are few non-professional sports that have compulsory testing for anti-doping other than the Olympics. And certainly there is no standard for Professional anti-doping. Existing laws would have to be completely rewritten around anti-doping policy to accommodate your twisted thinking to satisfy you moronic opinion and trample over citizens rights.

Your whole position on the subject is completely irrational. Even if the system allowed for an atypical testing process, the cost would be completely prohibitive.

[marbleheadmaui]

You have no opinion on the matter but your still talking uneducated bollox about a subject you don't have a clue about. Nice one.

You're not big on logic are you? It is possible to hold positions more complex than "he's cheating" or "he's not."

Your position is irrelavent IMO.

How many sports have you competed in where random testing was compulsory and could be done at any time? I'm willing to bet none. And I think that goes for everyone else other than me who have comented on this thread.

LOL, yeah like THAT's what it takes to understand the issues! I played college football with and against plenty of guys who were juicing. Didn't help me understand the issues we are discussing one iota.

[Hornfinger]

You have no opinion on the matter but your still talking uneducated bollox about a subject you don't have a clue about. Nice one.

You're not big on logic are you? It is possible to hold positions more complex than "he's cheating" or "he's not."

Your position is irrelavent IMO.

How many sports have you competed in where random testing was compulsory and could be done at any time? I'm willing to bet none. And I think that goes for everyone else other than me who have comented on this thread.

LOL, yeah like THAT's what it takes to understand the issues! I played college football with and against plenty of guys who were juicing. Didn't help me understand the issues we are discussing one iota.

Yes it does. If you've participated in a sport that has compulsory testing you understand the reasoning, you understand that it's the athletes job to prove he/she is clean, you understand that refusal to take testing is not an option and just makes you look guilty, you understand that a clean athlete will ALWAYS want to show he/she is clean.

You've never participated in a sport where testing is random and compulsory and thats why you don't understand.

[marbleheadmaui]

You have no opinion on the matter but your still talking uneducated bollox about a subject you don't have a clue about. Nice one.

You're not big on logic are you? It is possible to hold positions more complex than "he's cheating" or "he's not."

Your position is irrelavent IMO.

How many sports have you competed in where random testing was compulsory and could be done at any time? I'm willing to bet none. And I think that goes for everyone else other than me who have comented on this thread.

LOL, yeah like THAT's what it takes to understand the issues! I played college football with and against plenty of guys who were juicing. Didn't help me understand the issues we are discussing one iota.

Yes it does. If you've participated in a sport that has compulsory testing you understand the reasoning, you understand that it's the athletes job to prove he/she is clean, you understand that refusal to take testing is not an option and just makes you look guilty, you understand that a clean athlete will ALWAYS want to show he/she is clean.

You've never participated in a sport where testing is random and compulsory and thats why you don't understand.

LOL, that's the reasoning of a six year old. By the way, since boxing isn't one of those sports? Your entire line af argument is irrelevant.