Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
Why you couldn't have agreed with that 8 pages ago is completely beyond me.
Array
Array
The disgreement is not whether there should be a drug test but that it's Manny's fault that there isn't one.
In the first negotiation ....... yes.
If Floyd's intention was really to clean up the sport, then Manny gets all the blame. But with what happened in the second negotiation, it appeared that it was just an excuse by Floyd to avoid Manny in which case I still put half the blame with Manny in that first negotiation. He should have called Floyd's bluff.
In the second negotiation ........... no.
Last edited by InTheNeutralCorner; 05-21-2011 at 08:40 PM.
That's only if your talking about pac vs floyd. And the reasons why that fight didn't happen. I'm not talking about that so much.
Pac could have demanded drug testing in all/any of his fights since the first floyd negotiation.
It would have been sensible to do that for a number of reasons.....
It would have made it look without a shadow of a doubt that floyd was ducking him
It would have shown whatever floyd can do manny can do better
It would have proven him clean
It would have made him look like a pioneering hero of the sport
It would have pissed off all his detractors no end.
The list could honestly go on.
If I'd been in pacs shoes that's what I'd have done.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks