Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 113

Thread: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1357
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    It was a convincing Calzaghe win. A poor first few rounds, but practically a clean sweep thereafter. What it shows is that Hopkins has either taken fighters out of their weight class or purposely chosen relatively low output opponents.

    When faced with someone like Calzaghe, Hopkins simply cannot match the output. Calzaghe beats Hopkins at any stage in Hopkins career.

    Calzaghe gets underrated on forums. He is stylistic hell for practically anyone he faces.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    So who are you suggesting Calzaghe should have fought at 168 during his tenure as division chief?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    So who are you suggesting Calzaghe should have fought at 168 during his tenure as division chief?
    Ottke, Liles, Jones, Nunn, Echols off the top of my head. Look, the notion that you cleaned out a division when there is another unbeaten guy 300 miles away is sort of silly.

    And before the excuse making starts? I don't care. One either fights the fights or one doesn't.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    So who are you suggesting Calzaghe should have fought at 168 during his tenure as division chief?
    Ottke, Liles, Jones, Nunn, Echols off the top of my head. Look, the notion that you cleaned out a division when there is another unbeaten guy 300 miles away is sort of silly.

    And before the excuse making starts? I don't care. One either fights the fights or one doesn't.
    Otke wouldn't go near Calzaghe, Jones Jr was a LHW all the time Calzaghe was a SMW, likewise Nunn was a CW/LHW. The Echols fight could have come off, but he was pretty much done by the time he reached SMW.

    You are looking for holes that don't exist. Calzaghe kept his division clean just as Hopkins did, it's just that Calzaghes biggest wins were not against LMW's moving up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    So who are you suggesting Calzaghe should have fought at 168 during his tenure as division chief?
    Ottke, Liles, Jones, Nunn, Echols off the top of my head. Look, the notion that you cleaned out a division when there is another unbeaten guy 300 miles away is sort of silly.

    And before the excuse making starts? I don't care. One either fights the fights or one doesn't.
    Otke wouldn't go near Calzaghe, Jones Jr was a LHW all the time Calzaghe was a SMW, likewise Nunn was a CW/LHW. The Echols fight could have come off, but he was pretty much done by the time he reached SMW.

    You are looking for holes that don't exist. Calzaghe kept his division clean just as Hopkins did, it's just that Calzaghes biggest wins were not against LMW's moving up.
    LOL and the excuses begin! Ottke and Calzaghe were in the same division for what? nearly a decade? Nunn was in the division for three years when Calzaghe was, BTW, Nunn was middleweight champ, Echols was ranked in the top five in 2002, 2003 and 2004. Liles was ranked in the top five in 1997-1998.

    The comparisons aren't even close.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    Here is another major difference. Hopkins didn't leave America for one single fight during that period. Between 1994 and 2004 he fought 18 opponents. 16 were American based. 1 was Canadian. So the only guy travelling from outside North America was - Hakkar. An average French alphabet ranked no.1 contender.

    Calzaghe lived in Britain.
    Ottke lived in Germany.
    Liles/Nunn/Echols lived in America (these are pretty poor choices really).

    It's blatantly obvious that matching fighters from different countries is far more problematic than when everyone is operating in the same place. Especially when these fighters are posing as "world" champion with their different pieces of alphabet.

    It's fine to say no excuses these guys should have met. But it's clearly not that simple.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    Here is another major difference. Hopkins didn't leave America for one single fight during that period. Between 1994 and 2004 he fought 18 opponents. 16 were American based. 1 was Canadian. So the only guy travelling from outside North America was - Hakkar. An average French alphabet ranked no.1 contender.

    Calzaghe lived in Britain.
    Ottke lived in Germany.
    Liles/Nunn/Echols lived in America (these are pretty poor choices really).

    It's blatantly obvious that matching fighters from different countries is far more problematic than when everyone is operating in the same place. Especially when these fighters are posing as "world" champion with their different pieces of alphabet.

    It's fine to say no excuses these guys should have met. But it's clearly not that simple.
    Actually it is. One gets credit for the fights one actually has and none for the ones one doesn't. Everything else is excuses or rationalizations.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    801
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Calzaghe beat Hopkins did he not enough said .

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by roberto duran legend View Post
    Calzaghe beat Hopkins did he not enough said .
    Yup. And Kirkland Laing beat Roberto Duran. Your point?
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    801
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Yeah i agree , the super six has had its problems but at least we can see the best fighting the best its a great concept .

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    Here is another major difference. Hopkins didn't leave America for one single fight during that period. Between 1994 and 2004 he fought 18 opponents. 16 were American based. 1 was Canadian. So the only guy travelling from outside North America was - Hakkar. An average French alphabet ranked no.1 contender.

    Calzaghe lived in Britain.
    Ottke lived in Germany.
    Liles/Nunn/Echols lived in America (these are pretty poor choices really).

    It's blatantly obvious that matching fighters from different countries is far more problematic than when everyone is operating in the same place. Especially when these fighters are posing as "world" champion with their different pieces of alphabet.

    It's fine to say no excuses these guys should have met. But it's clearly not that simple.
    Actually it is. One gets credit for the fights one actually has and none for the ones one doesn't. Everything else is excuses or rationalizations.
    That's fine. Only judge fighters by whom they have fought.

    But it's unfair to penalise fighters for failing to meet guys that didn't want to fight.

    Sven Ottke's trainer, Ulli Wegner, has gone on record to state that Ottke never wanted anything to do with Calzaghe. There were numerous attempts to make this fight. So Calzaghe deserves to be forever downplayed because a man REFUSED to fight him?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's win over B-Hop looks better all the time.......

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Yep thats gotta be his best win, out of the 3-4 good fighters he's faced in 46 fights.
    You're right Calzaghe should have played it like B-Hop, beat up blownup Welterweights to make a name for himself early in his career.

    You can argue who won the fight, but that whiteboy didn't make it easy for B-Hop. THis whole B-Hop won 4 or 5 more rounds is ridiculous.
    and Calzaghe made his name beating up on has beens (Jones and Eubank) pretenders (Sheika, Bika and Manfredo Jr), or given gift decisions (Hopkins and Reid), his only stand out non controversial wins that deserve any real praise are his wins against Kessler and Lacey

    as always it works both ways
    Yes it goes both ways homey. The same people shitting on JC, his resume, and fighting ability, mysteriously excuse Hopkins for everything else.
    Here is one major difference. BHOP really did wreck the middles from 1994-2004 didn't he? Was there any obvious guy he didn't face? With JC at 168 the story just isn't the same.
    Here is another major difference. Hopkins didn't leave America for one single fight during that period. Between 1994 and 2004 he fought 18 opponents. 16 were American based. 1 was Canadian. So the only guy travelling from outside North America was - Hakkar. An average French alphabet ranked no.1 contender.

    Calzaghe lived in Britain.
    Ottke lived in Germany.
    Liles/Nunn/Echols lived in America (these are pretty poor choices really).

    It's blatantly obvious that matching fighters from different countries is far more problematic than when everyone is operating in the same place. Especially when these fighters are posing as "world" champion with their different pieces of alphabet.

    It's fine to say no excuses these guys should have met. But it's clearly not that simple.
    Actually it is. One gets credit for the fights one actually has and none for the ones one doesn't. Everything else is excuses or rationalizations.
    That's fine. Only judge fighters by whom they have fought.

    But it's unfair to penalise fighters for failing to meet guys that didn't want to fight.

    Sven Ottke's trainer, Ulli Wegner, has gone on record to state that Ottke never wanted anything to do with Calzaghe. There were numerous attempts to make this fight. So Calzaghe deserves to be forever downplayed because a man REFUSED to fight him?
    Sure. His resume with a win over Ottke would have been better, right? His resume with a win over Liles? better still. Echols? better yet.

    If it is ONE guy? Doesn't matter much as a single win can't usually change a lot in terms of resume. It is when, off the top of one's head one can come up with 5-6 that one starts to say hmmmmm.

    Let's not forget, I'm not arguing Calzaghe wasn't a great fighter. The issue is how great? That's pretty rarified air and comp matters a great deal doesn't it?
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Calzaghe's Win Over Hopkins.................
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-22-2009, 04:21 PM
  2. When was Joe Calzaghe's Prime?
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 11:58 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-07-2009, 11:15 AM
  4. Calzaghe's third belt???
    By Preme in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-01-2007, 08:49 PM
  5. Calzaghe's next opponent who do we think??
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-22-2006, 01:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing