
Originally Posted by
JonesJrMayweather

Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
JonesJrMayweather

Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
JonesJrMayweather
It's also funny that some talk about BHOP's technical skills, yet roy clearly out pointed him. But I guess BHOP was too green, even though he had more fights than roy, and he was ranked #1 MW and Roy #2. Roy is discredited as if he was prime and BHOP wasn't. The best version of Roy would have beaten the best version bhop 9 out 10 times.
BHOP was ranked #9 at the time.
You can skip to 29 seconds....
Um those are th IBF rankings and therefore meaningless. Ring had BHOP ninth.
Okay, fine let's do it your way, since only the RING rankings matter. Ring had Roy at the top, bhop at 8. Roy get's discredited on his resume even though he beat 5 out of 9 of them. ranked by ring. Then as a super middleweight he beat most of the RING RANKED opponents, and LHW, he beat most them too. But his resume sucks? BHOP is ATG and a technical genius, although by comparison his resume is weaker than RJJ's.... go figure.
Why is BHOP the resume standard again? I think BHOP belongs very close to Dick Tiger, both 160 and 175 champs, both beat 20 or so ranked guys and both beat several HOFers. According to where Ring ranks Tiger that puts BHOP somewhere in the 30's since 1922 and by implication probably around 40-50 or so all-time. According to Bert Sugar that puts BHOP around 60ish all-time.
Now I've got Tiger a little better than that. Probably in the 40's somewhere.
Now checking a few things I've got Roy beating 2 HOFers, a one division champ (apples to apples with how I count BHOP's and Tigers) and by my quick count, beat 16 ranked guys. Enormously impressive. But is that really measurably better than BHOP's? Looks pretty close to me.
Bookmarks