Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Last edited by Hornfinger; 05-31-2011 at 11:17 AM.
Array
Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:
Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.
And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.
Array
Your statement above does not contain any valid points. You're blabbering again like a parrot. Try again.
With regards to credibility, I am reminding you of post #328:
Evidence of written admission of being unable to prove credibility. End of discussion. Case closed.
Come back when you have redeemed your credibility.
Last edited by InTheNeutralCorner; 05-31-2011 at 10:00 PM.
You've shot yourself in the foot there, my not so inteligent but try hard friend.
If I don't have any credibility for using the 'it weakens me' excuse, then BY YOUR REASONING, your beloved pacquiao has the same amount of credibility for using the exact same excuse.
Game. set. Match. Hornfinger.
Comeback when you have the results of pacquiao's random blood test.![]()
Array
Array
Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.
The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.
You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?
hornfinger's
credibility is
!!!!!
![]()
Last edited by InTheNeutralCorner; 06-01-2011 at 03:41 AM.
Are you still crying?
Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.
My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?
The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.
By all means carry on....
Last edited by Hornfinger; 06-01-2011 at 01:18 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks