WTF is PBF demanding w/ those Blood Tests???

[InTheNeutralCorner]

hornfinger and the rest need to oil themselves up naked and play rugby

This thread makes entertaining reading, keep it up chaps, box on

That sneaky brocktonblockbust , after instigating this by starting the thread he just disappeared.

You sneaky devil, where have you been hiding all these times?

[brocktonblockbust]

ok Im back, where's the oil and the football?

[InTheNeutralCorner]

ok Im back, where's the oil and the football?

You first have to get naked.

[Hornfinger]

Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:

Done with your vacation already?

Lol your delusions are getting worse.

I don't post on a forum for a day so I must be on vacation. It's called having a life. Try it sometime. It might get you away from masterbating over pacquiao posters once in a while.

Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.

And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.

you had 20+ pages to answer the points, you failed miserably despite me having to post each point 5+ times because you kept dodging the issues. Let's just leave it at that. Maybe you should check your own credibility

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:

Done with your vacation already?

Lol your delusions are getting worse.

I don't post on a forum for a day so I must be on vacation. It's called having a life. Try it sometime. It might get you away from masterbating over pacquiao posters once in a while.

Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.

And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.

you had 20+ pages to answer the points, you failed miserably despite me having to post each point 5+ times because you kept dodging the issues. Let's just leave it at that. Maybe you should check your own credibility

Your statement above does not contain any valid points. You're blabbering again like a parrot. Try again.

With regards to credibility, I am reminding you of post #328:

Aren't you supposed to be the one to prove that you have been passionate about this anti-drug thing before Floyd's request and not the other way around? This is what you expect Pacquiao to do. You want the burden of proof to be with Manny to prove that he is clean so this also applies to you to prove that you are credible.

I'm flattered that you think my posts on a forum are as important as an athlete participating in a potential fatal sport proving he's not cheating.



I already told you I can't prove it because it weakens me (you believe that excuse with pacquiao so you'll believe it with me otherwise it's just double standards....)

Evidence of written admission of being unable to prove credibility. End of discussion. Case closed.

Come back when you have redeemed your credibility.

[Hornfinger]

Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:

Done with your vacation already?

Lol your delusions are getting worse.

I don't post on a forum for a day so I must be on vacation. It's called having a life. Try it sometime. It might get you away from masterbating over pacquiao posters once in a while.

Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.

And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.

you had 20+ pages to answer the points, you failed miserably despite me having to post each point 5+ times because you kept dodging the issues. Let's just leave it at that. Maybe you should check your own credibility

Your statement above does not contain any valid points. You're blabbering again like a parrot. Try again.

With regards to credibility, I am reminding you of post #328:

Aren't you supposed to be the one to prove that you have been passionate about this anti-drug thing before Floyd's request and not the other way around? This is what you expect Pacquiao to do. You want the burden of proof to be with Manny to prove that he is clean so this also applies to you to prove that you are credible.

I'm flattered that you think my posts on a forum are as important as an athlete participating in a potential fatal sport proving he's not cheating.



I already told you I can't prove it because it weakens me (you believe that excuse with pacquiao so you'll believe it with me otherwise it's just double standards....)

Evidence of written admission of being unable to prove credibility. End of discussion. Case closed.

Come back when you have redeemed your credibility.

You've shot yourself in the foot there, my not so inteligent but try hard friend.

If I don't have any credibility for using the 'it weakens me' excuse, then BY YOUR REASONING, your beloved pacquiao has the same amount of credibility for using the exact same excuse.

Game. set. Match. Hornfinger.

Comeback when you have the results of pacquiao's random blood test.

[fan johnny]

Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:

Done with your vacation already?

Lol your delusions are getting worse.

I don't post on a forum for a day so I must be on vacation. It's called having a life. Try it sometime. It might get you away from masterbating over pacquiao posters once in a while.

Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.

And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.

you had 20+ pages to answer the points, you failed miserably despite me having to post each point 5+ times because you kept dodging the issues. Let's just leave it at that. Maybe you should check your own credibility

Your statement above does not contain any valid points. You're blabbering again like a parrot. Try again.

With regards to credibility, I am reminding you of post #328:

Aren't you supposed to be the one to prove that you have been passionate about this anti-drug thing before Floyd's request and not the other way around? This is what you expect Pacquiao to do. You want the burden of proof to be with Manny to prove that he is clean so this also applies to you to prove that you are credible.

I'm flattered that you think my posts on a forum are as important as an athlete participating in a potential fatal sport proving he's not cheating.



I already told you I can't prove it because it weakens me (you believe that excuse with pacquiao so you'll believe it with me otherwise it's just double standards....)

Evidence of written admission of being unable to prove credibility. End of discussion. Case closed.

Come back when you have redeemed your credibility.

You've shot yourself in the foot there, my not so inteligent but try hard friend.

If I don't have any credibility for using the 'it weakens me' excuse, then BY YOUR REASONING, your beloved pacquiao has the same amount of credibility for using the exact same excuse.

Game. set. Match. Hornfinger.

Comeback when you have the results of pacquiao's random blood test.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:

Done with your vacation already?

Lol your delusions are getting worse.

I don't post on a forum for a day so I must be on vacation. It's called having a life. Try it sometime. It might get you away from masterbating over pacquiao posters once in a while.

Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.

And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.

you had 20+ pages to answer the points, you failed miserably despite me having to post each point 5+ times because you kept dodging the issues. Let's just leave it at that. Maybe you should check your own credibility

Your statement above does not contain any valid points. You're blabbering again like a parrot. Try again.

With regards to credibility, I am reminding you of post #328:

Aren't you supposed to be the one to prove that you have been passionate about this anti-drug thing before Floyd's request and not the other way around? This is what you expect Pacquiao to do. You want the burden of proof to be with Manny to prove that he is clean so this also applies to you to prove that you are credible.

I'm flattered that you think my posts on a forum are as important as an athlete participating in a potential fatal sport proving he's not cheating.



I already told you I can't prove it because it weakens me (you believe that excuse with pacquiao so you'll believe it with me otherwise it's just double standards....)

Evidence of written admission of being unable to prove credibility. End of discussion. Case closed.

Come back when you have redeemed your credibility.

You've shot yourself in the foot there, my not so inteligent but try hard friend.

If I don't have any credibility for using the 'it weakens me' excuse, then BY YOUR REASONING, your beloved pacquiao has the same amount of credibility for using the exact same excuse.

Game. set. Match. Hornfinger.

Comeback when you have the results of pacquiao's random blood test.

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

[Hornfinger]

Calling each other by the level of their IQ is fine but this graphic insults did get out of hand after this stupid post #327:

Done with your vacation already?

Lol your delusions are getting worse.

I don't post on a forum for a day so I must be on vacation. It's called having a life. Try it sometime. It might get you away from masterbating over pacquiao posters once in a while.

Although I didn't start it, I am mature enough to end it. As there is a call to end this back and forth insults with no points being made, the poster before this did not seem to get it.

And hornfinger, if you are able to redeem your credibitlity and has anymore valid points, I'd be willing to answer them.

you had 20+ pages to answer the points, you failed miserably despite me having to post each point 5+ times because you kept dodging the issues. Let's just leave it at that. Maybe you should check your own credibility

Your statement above does not contain any valid points. You're blabbering again like a parrot. Try again.

With regards to credibility, I am reminding you of post #328:

Aren't you supposed to be the one to prove that you have been passionate about this anti-drug thing before Floyd's request and not the other way around? This is what you expect Pacquiao to do. You want the burden of proof to be with Manny to prove that he is clean so this also applies to you to prove that you are credible.

I'm flattered that you think my posts on a forum are as important as an athlete participating in a potential fatal sport proving he's not cheating.



I already told you I can't prove it because it weakens me (you believe that excuse with pacquiao so you'll believe it with me otherwise it's just double standards....)

Evidence of written admission of being unable to prove credibility. End of discussion. Case closed.

Come back when you have redeemed your credibility.

You've shot yourself in the foot there, my not so inteligent but try hard friend.

If I don't have any credibility for using the 'it weakens me' excuse, then BY YOUR REASONING, your beloved pacquiao has the same amount of credibility for using the exact same excuse.

Game. set. Match. Hornfinger.

Comeback when you have the results of pacquiao's random blood test.

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

Are you still crying?

Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.

My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?

The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.

By all means carry on....

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

Are you still crying?

Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.

My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?

The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.

By all means carry on....

You claim to have advocated for a random blood test even before the Mayweather accusation. That accusation was made just less than 2 years ago so you still have more than 3 years of available old posts that you can sort through, something that I suspect you already did during your mini vacation but could not find anything.

Your credibility is shot because you made a statement and can't prove it. This is no different from you accusing Pacquiao of being on drugs because he can't prove it (based on your opinion) and him finally agreeing to the drug test is not good enough for you.

WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE CHICKEN, I MEAN GANDER.

and

YOU HAVE TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN SHIT, I MEAN MEDICINE.

[Hornfinger]

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

Are you still crying?

Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.

My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?

The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.

By all means carry on....

You claim to have advocated for a random blood test even before the Mayweather accusation. That accusation was made just less than 2 years ago so you still have more than 3 years of available old posts that you can sort through, something that I suspect you already did during your mini vacation but could not find anything.

Your credibility is shot because you made a statement and can't prove it. This is no different from you accusing Pacquiao of being on drugs because he can't prove it (based on your opinion) and him finally agreeing to the drug test is not good enough for you.

WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE CHICKEN, I MEAN GANDER.

and

YOU HAVE TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN SHIT, I MEAN MEDICINE.

3 things

1) I don't feel my credibility is damaged so see no point in wasting time sifting through this forum to find posts I've made in the past. (No I haven't even bothered looking. I have too much of a life and I'm not enough of a geek)

2) You're not important enough for me top feel the need to waste time sifting through the forum to find posts I know are there. (To me you're a pactard who has no life and I don't rate you higher than shit on my shoe )

3) I've already won

[mafiajoey]

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

Are you still crying?

Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.

My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?

The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.

By all means carry on....

You claim to have advocated for a random blood test even before the Mayweather accusation. That accusation was made just less than 2 years ago so you still have more than 3 years of available old posts that you can sort through, something that I suspect you already did during your mini vacation but could not find anything.

Your credibility is shot because you made a statement and can't prove it. This is no different from you accusing Pacquiao of being on drugs because he can't prove it (based on your opinion) and him finally agreeing to the drug test is not good enough for you.

WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE CHICKEN, I MEAN GANDER.

and

YOU HAVE TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN SHIT, I MEAN MEDICINE.

3 things

1) I don't feel my credibility is damaged so see no point in wasting time sifting through this forum to find posts I've made in the past. (No I haven't even bothered looking. I have too much of a life and I'm not enough of a geek)

2) You're not important enough for me top feel the need to waste time sifting through the forum to find posts I know are there. (To me you're a pactard who has no life and I don't rate you higher than shit on my shoe )

3) I've already won

Yes you have won.... to bad if you don't think Pac is a God you are dismissed in this forum as a Flomo

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

Are you still crying?

Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.

My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?

The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.

By all means carry on....

You claim to have advocated for a random blood test even before the Mayweather accusation. That accusation was made just less than 2 years ago so you still have more than 3 years of available old posts that you can sort through, something that I suspect you already did during your mini vacation but could not find anything.

Your credibility is shot because you made a statement and can't prove it. This is no different from you accusing Pacquiao of being on drugs because he can't prove it (based on your opinion) and him finally agreeing to the drug test is not good enough for you.

WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE CHICKEN, I MEAN GANDER.

and

YOU HAVE TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN SHIT, I MEAN MEDICINE.

3 things

1) I don't feel my credibility is damaged so see no point in wasting time sifting through this forum to find posts I've made in the past. (No I haven't even bothered looking. I have too much of a life and I'm not enough of a geek) Of course, you haven't. I don't blame you. Who would bother looking for something to redeem a credibility knowing it isn't there?

2) You're not important enough for me top feel the need to waste time sifting through the forum to find posts I know are there. (To me you're a pactard who has no life and I don't rate you higher than shit on my shoe ) How could we believe this if there is no proof? This is according to your rule, I didn't make it. No proof means it's not true.

3) I've already won Goody, Goody. What did you win? Oh wait, you're not credible.

If you deemed someone is guilty after an accusation and that it's up to them to prove themselves, then this also applies to you. There is no way around this.

So which is it? Are they guilty until proven innocent or are they innocent until proven guilty?

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Pacquiao's credibility was tarnished in his refusal to the demanded drug test in the first negotiation. I never said it hasn't. But he redeemed himself by agreeing to that same drug test in the second negotiation.

The difference between Pacquiao and you is that he had not admitted to it whereas YOU ADMITTED THAT YOU CAN NOT PROVE YOUR CREDIBILITY (only someone guilty or stupid would admit to this, so which one is it?) and that YOU HAVEN'T REDEEMED YOURSELF. So your credibility is still non-existent at this time.

You thought you can get one over me. Who's not intelligent now?

hornfinger's credibility is !!!!!

Are you still crying?

Good for you, good for you. I agree pacquiao has no credibility.

My credibility is shot because posts made 5+ years ago don't exist on this forum. That's great logic. Like I've said before, You're not very bright are you?

The more you bang on about 'my credibility' the more I'm convinced you know that you're beaten.

By all means carry on....

You claim to have advocated for a random blood test even before the Mayweather accusation. That accusation was made just less than 2 years ago so you still have more than 3 years of available old posts that you can sort through, something that I suspect you already did during your mini vacation but could not find anything.

Your credibility is shot because you made a statement and can't prove it. This is no different from you accusing Pacquiao of being on drugs because he can't prove it (based on your opinion) and him finally agreeing to the drug test is not good enough for you.

WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE CHICKEN, I MEAN GANDER.

and

YOU HAVE TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN SHIT, I MEAN MEDICINE.

3 things

1) I don't feel my credibility is damaged so see no point in wasting time sifting through this forum to find posts I've made in the past. (No I haven't even bothered looking. I have too much of a life and I'm not enough of a geek)

2) You're not important enough for me top feel the need to waste time sifting through the forum to find posts I know are there. (To me you're a pactard who has no life and I don't rate you higher than shit on my shoe )

3) I've already won

Yes you have won.... to bad if you don't think Pac is a God you are dismissed in this forum as a Flomo

Wow, another unbiased poster !!!

Maybe you can get away with it with the not so frequent visitors here but the regular members know better.

[miron_lang]

Update :

Now Berto is accusing Ortiz

Losers and duckers' new excuse: 'They're on something!!!' - National Filipino Sports | Examiner.com


IF you lose or need to duck someone, accuse him of using PEDS