Quote Originally Posted by captainanddew View Post
agreed Marble. There are less fighters and more belts. Competition is thus much less to be a beltholder.

Years ago in the US, basketball wasn't what it is now. Football wasn't what it is now. There has been a proliferation of other sports in which one can make a living. It has taken away from boxing.
The proliferation of belts makes me appreciate a fighter who fights top competition and proves he is THE MAN in a division. It isn't an accomplishment as impressive as yesteryear, but it still to be commended and respected.
Agree on all counts but especially the bold. 50+ years ago there were two sports, maybe three that allowed a top athlete to make good money. Boxing, baseball and perhaps being a jockey.

Now one can make a living at football, basketball, soccer, tennis, swimming, track and field, gymnastics, weightlifting, golf and on and on we go. How many would choose to get hit in the head when they have options?