Quote Originally Posted by Boxer4life View Post
Quote Originally Posted by BigSkinny87 View Post
Alright guys, this is off topic, please don't hate at me for posting this, I just thought it would be a good change of pace, so please share your opinions.

In the old days if you had a dispute with some one you would challenge them to a duel, pistol or fist. While I prefer the latter, with today's laws a fist is labeled as a deadly weapon.

Why can't disputes be settled between consenting adults? Say you have a problem with somebody at work (where this is mostly coming from ) and the fucking guys just irritates the shit out of me.

I am new at the job, in my 3rd week, he has been there for a while. Totally impolite, bumps into me and does not say excuse himself. I imagine myself landing a nice left hook and putting his pompous ass to sleep.

Not only would I lose my job, I would most definitely be fucked by the fuzz.


Is it "archaic" in modern times to settle disputes in such manner.
you know one time some guy at work told me to shut my trap, i was immediately interrupted by a customer, i helped, and proceeded to find the fell, i told him "if u ever talk to me like that again....i will fuck you up!" he apologized and was a complete ass kisser for the remainder of my time at that place, now if he were to decide to take it outside, well he would have made my fucking day ...basically, i think you should pull the guy to the side and let him know he is a moment away form getting destroyed, if he tells on you, deny it, and if he decides to act tough,well...take him outside
I'm of a similiar mindest.

The power of intimidation is very underrated. Most people are NOT fighters. Not in the least. And when push comes to shove, and you let them know that: A). You box and B). Your not afraid to fight. Then I figure the guy will become quite the sweetheart to you after that.