Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    820
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "brain damage" legit?

    Quote Originally Posted by MMASUX View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    One doesn't return from brain damage. If he comes back it was bs.
    Well i guess Brain damage was a bad choice of words on my part, i think they were saying nuerological issues. Let me edit that.
    OK fair enough. I still think he'll have a target on his back at the physicals for the major commissions (Nevada, New York, New Jersey). Neurological recovery (I am not a doctor nor do I play one on TV) takes a long time compared to other injuries.

    Even the way you modified things I see only two likely scenarios. First, there really were significant issues and he'll have trouble getting licensed or second, hist team made crap up to cover up for his strange post-fight behavior after Abraham drilled him.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    They were real enough to prevent him from fighting his dear friend. That punch from Abraham was a blessing for Dirrell. Not only did it get him a win. But it provided an out from the Ward fight. A fight Ward didn't really seem to want. And a fight Dirrell seemed to be scared to death of. Only problem for Dirrell was it backed him into a corner where he couldn't fight for awhile. He was originally suppose to return in January if I remember correctly. But couldn't. Not that there was anything wrong with him. It's just a good amount of people were saying bullshit to his excuse already. For him to return from this "career threatening" injury in less than a year would pretty much confirm he was bullshitting. So on the sidelines he sits

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    732
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    843
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Yea i think he overplayed it. I agree with VD, he had no choice but to sit out for awhile. Curious to see how he looks after all this time off. As of now it's been 15 months, by the time he comes back maybe 18 months or longer? Thats a long time to be out of the ring, but with so many fight options at 168 i guess he should have no problem getting some good fight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Boxing and brain damage.
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 12-07-2008, 01:02 PM
  2. "The Contender"... Finally legit!!!!!!!!!!
    By PRIDE OF BOSTON in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-10-2007, 06:46 PM
  3. Does Toney have BRAIN DAMAGE?
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-06-2006, 12:38 PM
  4. brain damage
    By satori in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-24-2006, 07:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing