Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 47

Thread: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    It's not as if Dirrell was hurt enough to a point where should have been on the canvas, convulsing like an infantile retard but he did take a half swing from a heavy-handed Abraham unexpectedly so i i think his brain was scrambled for a good sec. But When he started saying some weird shit like I got Knocked out blah blah, I thought that was bogus kinda like when Oscar won the Oscar for that performance he put on with Hopkins. But anyway, Im a big fan of Dirrell's style and i give him all the credit for the way he fought Abe.. During the fight at least, he fought like a real fighter and was on his way to a UD victory anyways..

    Direll has a bad ass style..

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1391
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Yeah I agree, to be fair I actually REALLY like his ability to time counter punches almost as if he'd just come back from the future and knew exactly when and what shit was about to go down. Scary stuff.

    I don't know if should even call them counter punches, thier more like pre-emptive strikes!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    785
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    The guy is a fraud , he made a big deal out of that punch from AA because he did not want to fight Andre Ward , and get beat , enough said .

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
    It's not as if Dirrell was hurt enough to a point where should have been on the canvas, convulsing like an infantile retard but he did take a half swing from a heavy-handed Abraham unexpectedly so i i think his brain was scrambled for a good sec. But When he started saying some weird shit like I got Knocked out blah blah, I thought that was bogus kinda like when Oscar won the Oscar for that performance he put on with Hopkins. But anyway, Im a big fan of Dirrell's style and i give him all the credit for the way he fought Abe.. During the fight at least, he fought like a real fighter and was on his way to a UD victory anyways..

    Direll has a bad ass style..
    Dirrell style is garbage. It's not even a set style. It's a mixture of occasional striker/majority show-boater/ runner/whiner. There's no denying his skills and talent. He either just doesn't know how to really use it or isn't as confidence in them as he likes people to think he is. The Curtis Stevens fight (if you can call it that) was an embarrassment to both fighters. But mostly him. I think Dirrell got screwed against Fraud. But in reality the fight shouldn't even of been close if Dirrell would of fought the way he was suppose to. The Abraham fight was a great work. For 8 rounds. Than he started hitting the wall. He didn't trip. It was a legit knock down. He was fading pretty fast in that fight I don't think Abraham would of caught him in time. But there was no way Dirrell was gonna take that chance. He saw a way and took it. Dirrell so far is a waste of talent

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1391
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    V, do you really think Carl Froch is Fraud?
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2076
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    lol... Calling carl an all time great or a top 5 p4p fighter may be a bit too much... But to call him 'fraud'? You're either retarded or trolling. He is nothing but 100% legit.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Carl Froch is bad bad man.. He's a battle tested warrior who has proved himself over and over against the best.. That's no fraud..

    A fraud is someone like Ricky Hatton.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2076
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Was talking with a client the other day and both agreeing that Froch is way ahead of Hatton when it comes to genuine achievement but seems to get a fraction of the recognition from his countrymen.

    He should drink, smoke, snort and constantly go on about it between fights more.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Was talking with a client the other day and both agreeing that Froch is way ahead of Hatton when it comes to genuine achievement but seems to get a fraction of the recognition from his countrymen.

    He should drink, smoke, snort and constantly go on about it between fights more.
    He should also try running into the ringpost face-first or get knocked out flat on his back in the second round. Maybe that'll boost his popularity.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Was talking with a client the other day and both agreeing that Froch is way ahead of Hatton when it comes to genuine achievement but seems to get a fraction of the recognition from his countrymen.

    He should drink, smoke, snort and constantly go on about it between fights more.
    Is Froch really ahead of Hatton in genuine achievement? Hatton was able to build a huge fan base and supporters in the UK because he was well liked, Froch simply isn't as popular.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1391
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    He said genuine achievement... lol

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    My own personal theory is, Dirrell was winning the fight, but Abraham had been slowly getting to him with hard shots. By the time the 11th round rolled around, Dirrell was getting desperate, close to being stopped and looking for a way out, Abraham conveniently provided him with one. Dirrell basically just quit, that's my 2 cents.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 06-11-2011 at 10:41 PM.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2076
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Boxing's not a popularity contest...

    (or a pie eating contest)

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1307
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Lest we forget, Ricky Hatton was the lineal champ at 140 for a good four years. He defeated two future HOF's in Kosta Tszyu and Jose Luis Castillo. He held the IBO, IBF, and WBA belts at one point.

    Carl Froch has done very well, but at this point, his resume is at best on par with Hatton's, not much better than Hatton's. His best win is over Jean Pascal. Glen Johnson is a good win, but let's not get too carried away, he does have over 10 losses and he is 42. The Dirrell win was just a horrible fight, and objectively, Dirrell wasn't a champion, and Dirrell's biggest true victory is over Curtis Stevens (AA win was a DQ). Abraham is a former champion at middleweight, but he isn't a super middleweight. Jermain Taylor same. Don't get me wrong, Carl gets credit for those wins without a doubt. However, when Froch stepped up to an elite level fighter (although I would say overrated too) at his weight in Kessler, he lost. Froch also has never beat an assured HOF although perhaps arguably Jermain will make it to the hall. Froch's career at this point and Hatton's career overall are comparable, but Carl just doesn't have the career-defining win that Hatton did in Tszyu. I don't consider his win over Taylor or Pascal to be as good as Hatton's over Tszyu. A win over Ward might just be such a win.

    Please don't mistake this as an argument that Froch isn't a badass dude because he is - he fights anyone, anywhere, and always comes to fight. I was at the Jermain Taylor fight rooting for Jermain (as a patriot should ), and Carl won me over in that fight. He never gave up when he was down on points and he fought till the end with the crowd rooting against him.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: So was Dirrell's "Nuerological issues" legit?

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Boxing's not a popularity contest...

    (or a pie eating contest)
    Just saying, Hatton was adored by his fans in the UK, I don't believe even Calzaghe got that kind of adoration.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Boxing and brain damage.
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 12-07-2008, 01:02 PM
  2. "The Contender"... Finally legit!!!!!!!!!!
    By PRIDE OF BOSTON in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-10-2007, 06:46 PM
  3. Does Toney have BRAIN DAMAGE?
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-06-2006, 12:38 PM
  4. brain damage
    By satori in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-24-2006, 07:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing