Exactly, just strange dry retorts and insults.
Funny how I have never been banned before and yet Neutralasshole has. And yet they keep on coming back, I have no idea what they are trying to prove with this desire to be a slave to Manny Pac.
Exactly, just strange dry retorts and insults.
Funny how I have never been banned before and yet Neutralasshole has. And yet they keep on coming back, I have no idea what they are trying to prove with this desire to be a slave to Manny Pac.
I was wrong. Pacquiao just needs to prove that damage was done to his reputation in boxing. That'll be easy. Disregard my last statement.
If Floyd defamed Pacquiao, there is nothing wrong with Pacquiao bringing suit. Clearly, Floyd has maligned Pacquiao with his steroid accusations. Pacquiao will need to prove that Floyd's statements caused injury to his reputation, that the statements were false, Pacquiao is not on steroids (or wasn't on them when Floyd defamed him) and that Floyd acted with reckless disregard to the truth or falsity.
In my humble opinion, Pacquiao has a pretty good case of defamation. The statements are damaging to his reputation. Prior to Floyd's accusations, no one even considered whether Pacquiao was on steroids. Now, many people completely write him off. Pacquiao can show the statements are false with sufficient certainty by showing that he has never failed a drug test. He can also submit to the court a drug test on the spot and pass that test. Pacquiao then needs to show that Floyd acted with reckless disregard. Again, there is no way Floyd had any reason to believe that Pacquiao was on steroids other than he was successful rising in weight in boxing, which isn't uncommon. Floyd would need to show that Pacquiao has failed drug tests or have witnesses with firsthand knowledge testifying that Pacquiao took steroids.
Is it inconsistent to critique Pacquiao's recent victories as smoke and mirrors because of the alleged lack of quality opponents and at the same time accuse of Pacquiao of only being able to beat those same subpar opponents because of steroids?
Hmm.
I am here and am respected on my own terms. People like me for who I am. In fact I have realised it more since that incident. I am one of the most popular members here as you well know. But of course, you are being cute sticking up for your little banned brother. That is quite lovely, but I have outted him.
go back to page 5 and have a read dickhead.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA![]()
![]()
![]()
I get to use the quotes again!!!!!
The very same quote you have NO FUCKING ANSWER WHATSOEVER TO!!!
AS I've said in the past, asking to prove a guy that won't take a test guilty, is THE MOST RETARDED STUPID REDICULOUS MORONIC TWATISH DICKHEADED arguement going.
LMFAO! You're a fucking moron. You truly are.
Pacquiao is a fighter who has never tested positive for using any illegal substance or been involved closely with anybody that has been associated with the issue of steroids.
You're just trying to make something out of baseless accusation. Yet, you can't even make yourself sound convincing.
USADA lost their case with NSAC. And most likely Floyd will lose his defamation case.
Stop with your witchhunt, and wipe that Floyd's cum off your eyes and maybe you'll see who is the real bad guy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks