Pacquiao vs Marquez III- fight to use instant replay

[fan johnny]

Really need the details here to speak intelligently...or at least the way I usually speak.

They were posted on the forum before, maybe someone remembers the thread.

Did a quick search: http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...ayweather.html


This is the amended rule:
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/register/RegsReviewed/$R003-09A.pdf

4. After making a determination, a referee may view a replay, if available, at the
conclusion of a contest or exhibition stopped immediately due to an injury to an unarmed
combatant pursuant to NAC 467.718 in order to determine whether the injury in question was
caused by a legal blow or a foul.

(a) If the determination is made that the injury was the result of a legal blow, the injured
unarmed combatant shall be determined to have lost the contest via technical knockout.

(b) If the determination is made that the injury was the result of a foul, it must be
determined whether the foul was intentional or accidental.

(1) If deemed intentional, the outcome of the contest shall be determined in accord with
NAC 467.698; or

(2) If deemed accidental, the outcome of the contest shall be determined in accord with
NAC 467.702 or 467.7966.

Sec. 8. NAC 467.760 is hereby amended to read as follows:467.760

1. An unarmed combatant shall be deemed to be down when:
(a) Any part of his body other than his feet is on the floor; [or]
(b) He is hanging over the ropes without the ability to protect himself and he cannot fall to
the floor [.] ; or
(c) The unarmed combatant would have fallen to the floor but was held up by the ropes.

2. A referee may count an unarmed combatant out if the unarmed combatant is on the floor
or is being held up by the ropes.

3. The provisions of this section do not apply to a contest or exhibition of mixed martial
arts.

[Snakey]

They gave the UFC judges monitors so they could score more effectively as due to the cage its hard to see certain parts of the octagon. I see this as being a good idea, we have technology, we should take advantage of it.

[Pavlik]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

[Chino]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

If they will implement new things into boxing to make fights more fair then how about implement a more rigid blood/urine/etc. tests like the random blood tests (olympic style)?

[Pavlik]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

If they will implement new things into boxing to make fights more fair then how about implement a more rigid blood/urine/etc. tests like the random blood tests (olympic style)?

why not, but it should apply to EVERYBODY right?
and instated by an existing athletic commission.

[Master]

It should be used in football.

[Julius Rain]

It should be used in football.

American?

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

If they will implement new things into boxing to make fights more fair then how about implement a more rigid blood/urine/etc. tests like the random blood tests (olympic style)?

I don't think there had been any objection from the Pac fans with regards to having a more rigid blood/urine test. Like what Pavlik said, it should apply to everyone and implemented by the commission. The sooner they have that done, the better for the sport.

[SRR]

It won't be controversial because Marquez is now way passed his best, whilst Pac is in the latter stages of his 'peak'. Marquez is a spent force at this point, and that, of course, is why Roach has made this fight now. It's sickening that when Pac wins this time round, the Pac-tards will be on here screaming, frothing at the mouth about how Manny Pac finally got justice after he was unfairly robbed of a win against Marquez during their first fight. At least Ortiz is an up-and-comer, with both power, youth and technical ability on his side, aside from the fact that, as far as I know, he'll be fighting at a comfortable weight. He will still be outclassed, but at least it is a fair fight, as much as any fight is fair. But this fight being made at 147? Might as well put chains around his ankles. Marquez vs Pac at 125/129 were good, competitive fights, but we saw what happened to Marquez when he weighed in at 146 against Mayweather, he doesn't carry the weight well, and he's closer to 40 than 30, having been in a lot of wars. This will not be competitive, and Roach knows it - it's the only reason this fight has been made. Absolutely pathetic. Roach/Pac are getting more and more annoying as time goes on. If you're just gonna pick fights you KNOW you'll win, why bother? Just go and play politician ffs.

[Chino]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

If they will implement new things into boxing to make fights more fair then how about implement a more rigid blood/urine/etc. tests like the random blood tests (olympic style)?

I don't think there had been any objection from the Pac fans with regards to having a more rigid blood/urine test. Like what Pavlik said, it should apply to everyone and implemented by the commission. The sooner they have that done, the better for the sport.

Yes, applied to everybody without excuses to not take it.

[marinik80]

Pacquiao has an interestinf style of boxing.

[fan johnny]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

If they will implement new things into boxing to make fights more fair then how about implement a more rigid blood/urine/etc. tests like the random blood tests (olympic style)?

They already have: http://boxing.nv.gov/Hot%20Topics/NA...rugTesting.pdf

[Pavlik]

Great!!! Leaving nothing to chance!Just thinking of the dubious knockdown scored vs PAC against Barrera, the cut suffered by PAC vs Morales from a butt but the ref said from a punch, Mosley's knockdown vs PAC (thank God the judges didnt score it).
Greatest new ever!!!!

If they will implement new things into boxing to make fights more fair then how about implement a more rigid blood/urine/etc. tests like the random blood tests (olympic style)?

They already have: http://boxing.nv.gov/Hot%20Topics/NA...rugTesting.pdf

GREAT!!!