The fight went pretty much as I expected, except I was surprised that Haye wasn't knocked out, that's about the only thing I can think of, to give Haye any credit for.

I could make a pretty good case for Haye not winning a single round, so I don't get where some folks are saying this was a good performance by Haye. Please define a good performance for me, if being dominated and losing a lopsided decision somehow indicates a good performance, I must be missing something. Could this just be dry British humor?