Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
IF floyd returns to the ring against Ortiz looking like the same floyd that beat Shane Moseley, Then neither pacroid or Khan stand a chance in hell. TBH I'd still bet on floyd if he had to fight them both in the same night.
The only chance either of them have is if floyd comes back looking old. But if that does happen then floyd would retire.
Floyd will only fight either man if he feels 100% and if he's 100% he destroys both. Easily.
Array
Array
[SIGPIC]
Hidden Content
Array
Array
I take Pacs side on this one. Floyd is the one being the little bitch. Floyd could have gone down as the GOAT if he had just fought Hatton at 140, Margarito at 147, Cotto at 147, Williams at 147 and Pacquaio at 147 before someone else beat them. Floyd would have beaten them all. But he chose to be a bitch. I really dont see how Pac can beat Floyd. But again Floyd is acting like a scared clown. Just fight the guy, you will win! I would hope Pac would beat Floyd but if I had to bet the house it would be on Floyd no question.
PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.
Yes because Mayweather uses USADA testing to duck opponents, especially hane Mosley and Victor Ortiz, it's not like if Pacquiao's camp didn't accept and then go back on the drug testing that the fight would have happened, I mean look what happened when Mosley and Ortiz accepted those terms.. oh wait!!![]()
Array
Array
OMG, I'm now struggling to put this all in perspective. Let me see if this is right:
1. So Bob is saying that HE has a issue with the 'neutrality' of the USADA and suggests that the WADA should be used instead.
2. Then Victor Fuckin Conte pipes up and says that the USADA does not do any type of drug testing themselves, they simply refer the testing out to a WADA accredited laboratory.
3. The USADA media relations manager, Annie Skinner then stated in response: "No other organization in the US does the type of gold standard testing that that we do. Personally, at least, I've never heard of any third party organization that performs the WADA approved standards to the same degree that we do."
Which is only opinion of course and still does not solve the 'neutrality' with regards to the USADA or more specifically Senior Managing Director & General Counsel to USADA,Travis Tygart. But then...
4. Senior Media Relations & Communications Manager to the WADA, Terence O'Rorke unequivocally AGREES with USADA media relations manager Annie Skinner!!!
So where does that leave Bob?
Anyway... Here's a lovely little video to watch while you ponder the wonder...
Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 07-14-2011 at 12:57 PM.
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
Array
If you have any exposure to what the Hague is, then that is model on how WADA is setup. They are similar to a corporate office that basically doesn't have facilities to do the actual work but train branch offices (like franchises) to do the work. They also certify outside agencies to do the specialty work. (i.e. make approve the labs certifying that they meet the standards testing for PED's)
I didn't think Arum ever mentioned WADA as a administrative testing agency but rather specified an Olympic testing organization in he press release or something like that, but someone pointed out an article by Michael Marley and he quoted Arum as saying WADA would do the testing. I find it hard to believe Arum wouldn't understand out the system is setup and the relationship between WADA and USADA so I'm guessing he was trying to talk down to Marley although it's possible.
If doing a 'sig bet' proves you're not a pussy then I really don't know what this world has come to...![]()
Array
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks