
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin

Originally Posted by
Pavlik
Maybe this is a counter-demand

If you think about it PBF's claiming for a USADA drug testing is not warranted to begin with since there already exist a state athletic commission giving an existing test. Now it's the Olympic Organization that might be giving out these tests definitely an unbiased playing field is set out. If somebody complains again then I don't know what type of flat out cowardice that is. Just an opinion from a Pactard.
I may be wrong, but my understanding is that USADA are the Olympic designated authority for the United States through WADA. I actually believe that it's Arum who is responsible for this fight not being seen, having read through the timeline of the first round of negotiations. I would put 80% of the blame on him & 10% each on Floyd & Manny. Stupid old bastard

USADA is an independent organization not directly affiliated with any governmental organization which is why congress gave them the authority for testing US competing athletes. The purpose of not using the USOC for administering the testing is an attempt to deter cover ups from happening.
The problem with them is that they do not report (i.e. are not held accountable) to any governmental agency. They also have to produce results or the appearance of results in order to be awarded federal grant money which in itself is a conflict of interest. (We are talking about money in millions that they supposedly can spend however they want) The only connection between WADA and USADA is the list of banned substances and standards by which they test.
In the US typically the systems are setup so there is checks and balances between agencies. No one agency is given all the power. USADA is responsible for checking the athlete and prosecuting the athlete. This is a very bad idea under the US system of government because it leaves the door open to corruption. In USADA case one obvious problem is having to justify their existence which means they will unjustly seek out high profile athletes to prosecute because it will give them more visibility. Case:Lance Armstrong.
You guys have to remember Arum is a Lawyer and understands the rules far and the impact of changing a criteria better than most. It would be better of reporters would question Arums motives rather than jump to conclusions about why he hold a particular position.
Bookmarks