Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2488
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2446
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

    and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

    and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is
    he beat hopkins convincingly (ok some crazy judge gave it to hopkins)

    it was a clear win for calazaghi, why should he give him a rematch?

    is wlad avoiding a rematch with haye like the plague?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

    and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is
    he beat hopkins convincingly (ok some crazy judge gave it to hopkins)

    it was a clear win for calazaghi, why should he give him a rematch?

    is wlad avoiding a rematch with haye like the plague?

    based on what ? that calzaghe threw more wild shots? hit the air more often than hopkins ?

    and im pretty sure calzaghes win over veit was clear but he went back for more there didnt he

    and Wlad is all over a rematch with haye because he sees the £££

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2446
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

    and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is
    he beat hopkins convincingly (ok some crazy judge gave it to hopkins)

    it was a clear win for calazaghi, why should he give him a rematch?

    is wlad avoiding a rematch with haye like the plague?

    based on what ? that calzaghe threw more wild shots? hit the air more often than hopkins ?

    and im pretty sure calzaghes win over veit was clear but he went back for more there didnt he

    and Wlad is all over a rematch with haye because he sees the £££
    Or the fact that Hopkins didn't wina round after round 4 and had no answer to Calzaghe's workrate.
    God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1545
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.

    and then avoid a rematch like its the plague, claiming he doesnt do rematches ..... unless your marco veit that is
    He had to fight Veit or he would have been stripped of his wbo belt.
    Balls

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1051
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Calzaghe is a great boxer period.. But no way on earth would he beat prime roy at super middle..no one would. Not even wife beater ray robinson. Frank warren done well in keeping joe undefeated..just like rocky m they were both undefeated. But not the greatest.

  10. #10
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  12. #12
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Im at a loss how you thought Carl Froch beat Mikkel Kessler but thats just my opinion. I said i didn't want to debate it again, because its been debated to death trust me. I just liked B-Hop's cleaner punches.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Im at a loss how you thought Carl Froch beat Mikkel Kessler but thats just my opinion. I said i didn't want to debate it again, because its been debated to death trust me. I just liked B-Hop's cleaner punches.
    i did think froch won that fight, i can understand a case for the other way but i thought froch won a close fight, even those that thought kessler won thought it was close and some rounds could be seen either way

    i wont mention hopkins calazaghi gain then if you dont want to talk about it
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Age of peak
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 03:10 AM
  2. Peak?
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-26-2010, 06:04 PM
  3. Did Margarito peak?
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-31-2008, 01:11 PM
  4. The Peak-a-Boo Style Question
    By clean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 12:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing