Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Im at a loss how you thought Carl Froch beat Mikkel Kessler but thats just my opinion. I said i didn't want to debate it again, because its been debated to death trust me. I just liked B-Hop's cleaner punches.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why couldn't Calzaghe's peak have been around now :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    calzaghe wouldnt have fought them if he was around now they are not in their 40's.

    This !!
    Coz Hopkins has been shite in his forties Coming off convincing wins against Tarver and Winky, he loses to Calzaghe, then goes on to dominate undefeated Pavlik and even now is beating the likes of Pascal and lined up to fight Chad Dawson next.

    Somebody who 'ducks' people, doesn't fight Lacy (when everybody thought he was the 2nd coming) or undefeated Mikhael Kesler.
    I think B-Hop beat Joe Calzaghe but im not going to debate it again, also his win over Winky Wright wasn't convincing i had it a draw, plus remember Winky Wright was bloated at that weightclass aswell.

    B-Hop is still a very good fighter in his 40's, but he lacks the stamina he once had and the aggression. If he had fought Joe Calzaghe when he destroyed Glen Johnson, i think he would of won even wider like 8-4.
    I am at a loss to how anyone can think calazaghi lost to hopkins

    i like the debates that boxing brings when fights go to descision even some less debateable descisions can be debated but that fight was so clear cut, i dont think there can be any question who won
    Im at a loss how you thought Carl Froch beat Mikkel Kessler but thats just my opinion. I said i didn't want to debate it again, because its been debated to death trust me. I just liked B-Hop's cleaner punches.
    i did think froch won that fight, i can understand a case for the other way but i thought froch won a close fight, even those that thought kessler won thought it was close and some rounds could be seen either way

    i wont mention hopkins calazaghi gain then if you dont want to talk about it
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Age of peak
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 03:10 AM
  2. Peak?
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-26-2010, 06:04 PM
  3. Did Margarito peak?
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-31-2008, 01:11 PM
  4. The Peak-a-Boo Style Question
    By clean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 12:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing