Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,801
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Bradley should be classed as number 1 because he has earned the right by fighting the best and taking on all comers. He has stalled a bit because of contractual issues and certainly wants a shot at Manny Pacquia. Amir needs to defeat Bradley to be considered the best at the weight but how long should he wait and how can he force the man to enter the ring with him, if Bradley does not want it, before it is recognised that Amir should be the rightly number 1? Both fighters should forget about Manny and Floyd and fight one another. Bradley is certainly using Khan as a backup should he fail against Pacquia.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Bradley should be classed as number 1 because he has earned the right by fighting the best and taking on all comers. He has stalled a bit because of contractual issues and certainly wants a shot at Manny Pacquia. Amir needs to defeat Bradley to be considered the best at the weight but how long should he wait and how can he force the man to enter the ring with him, if Bradley does not want it, before it is recognised that Amir should be the rightly number 1? Both fighters should forget about Manny and Floyd and fight one another. Bradley is certainly using Khan as a backup should he fail against Pacquia.
    Not that it makes much difference, but Khan shouldn't be ranked over Bradley, who was dominating the division before Khan threw his hat in the ring as a Jr. WW.
    Styles make fights, and this figures to be a good one, and like I said on another thread, this fight makes the most sense for both Pugs, and like you said Master, forget about Manny and Floyd and fight one another.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 07-26-2011 at 08:29 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Bradley is an ambitious chicken shit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    817
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Ring has now placed Khan at #1 and Bradley at #2 at 140.

    Strangely Bradley remains ranked in the p4p list while Khan is not.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1041
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Ring has now placed Khan at #1 and Bradley at #2 at 140.

    Strangely Bradley remains ranked in the p4p list while Khan is not.
    Tis strange isn't it?

    I could understand it if Bradley was moving through the weight classes but not when he's been there his entire career. It's got to be typo, ya?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    817
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by fan johnny View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    Ring has now placed Khan at #1 and Bradley at #2 at 140.

    Strangely Bradley remains ranked in the p4p list while Khan is not.
    Tis strange isn't it?

    I could understand it if Bradley was moving through the weight classes but not when he's been there his entire career. It's got to be typo, ya?
    I agree, It made sense for a while that Manny was #1 p4p and not the top of any division. But in THIS case? Weird.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan Ranked No.1 at 140 NOT Bradley. Fact.

    Bradley is a throwback to boxers of the past, a tough guy. Khan may have a better punch but Bradley will get inside and hand him a beating. This would be a defining fight for Khan at this weight but I would not write Bradley off. He has been the under dog and made fools of the critics. Khan will do better on the outside but he is not a rough and tumble guy and Bradley is. MY Perception until the decision is in is 50-50 depending on who stays in their comfort zone the longest.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Guzman-Khan - Feb/March in Britain. Fact.
    By Fenster in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-09-2010, 09:00 PM
  2. Khan calls out Michael Jackson... FACT lol
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 02:40 AM
  3. Khan gets the BETTER of Pac sparring. Fact.
    By Fenster in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-21-2008, 03:27 PM
  4. Khan ranked #8 by The Ring
    By Mark TKO in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-30-2008, 10:52 PM
  5. AMIR KHAN ranked 11 by WBO!?!?!?!?!
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 12:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing