Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess"

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1335
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    Meh, don't really disagree with Bilbo on this, especially if the accounts of Bradley basically pricing himself out of a Khan fight are true. Its trendy to rag on the alphabet gangs of course and often with good reason, but inactive champions certainly hurt the sport more. I like Bradley enough but he doesn`t have superstar ability and basically needs to fight more often if he wants to preserve the things he does have going for him.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Meh, don't really disagree with Bilbo on this, especially if the accounts of Bradley basically pricing himself out of a Khan fight are true. Its trendy to rag on the alphabet gangs of course and often with good reason, but inactive champions certainly hurt the sport more. I like Bradley enough but he doesn`t have superstar ability and basically needs to fight more often if he wants to preserve the things he does have going for him.

    I don't understand what people are whining about half the time mate, they are never happy. No opponent is good enough, no belt is credible enough blah blah.

    We have two options.

    1)Bradley keeps the title, takes the year off and there is no WBC title fight this summer/autumn.

    2) As he refused to defend his belt the WBC move on and match two of the most exciting fighters in the division in what will likely be a great slugfest. Then Bradley is given the right as 'champion in recess' to fight the winner and get his belt back.

    So we get a nice title fight between two exciting stars, the WBC make some money, and Bradley gets to win his belt back when he decides to fight again.

    Sounds like simple common sense to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1335
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    Yea good point. Im sure Bradley himself didnt object to this, but leave it to everyone else to scream about it. Long as he doesnt seem to want to fight Khan or anyone else why not wait it out for a much easier payday. I figure people just dont really think about the way it will actually affect the involved fighters. Bradley knows he`ll never be a huge star and so his next couple of paydays will likely dictate the rest of his life financially, why the hell wouldnt he want a chance to win back his title from an ancient Morales or a crude puncher instead of putting all his chips in against Khan who is going to be around for a while.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,575
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1224
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    I don't care if they strip him. Its the comical recess bit that is absurd.
    Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    Quote Originally Posted by VictorCharlie View Post
    I don't care if they strip him. Its the comical recess bit that is absurd.
    It's just a way of ensuring he gets the first shot at the champion, he is the recognised opponent they must face which is fair enough.

    They deal in belts the way a lawyer might deal with wills and certificates. He now has an official status as challenger on account of his recess status. It's no different from them signing a certificate really, they just do it with blets because that's the currency they deal in. The UFC does it, all combat sport organisations do it. It's really no biggie.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    The reality is that Khan will now fight for WBC strap against Morales or who ever beats him and move to 147lb welterweight without fighting Bradley who really is the best fighter at the weight. That is wrong and perverse, if the WBC are a not for profit making organisation they should not grant them the title but next leading contender to fight Bradley. Just because it does not fit with Amir’s time table he forces the WBC to strip Bradley just so he can get another strap. Bradley is the best fighter at the weight and he can only lose that in the ring or inactivity which must be longer than a year at least.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The reality is that Khan will now fight for WBC strap against Morales or who ever beats him and move to 147lb welterweight without fighting Bradley who really is the best fighter at the weight. That is wrong and perverse, if the WBC are a not for profit making organisation they should not grant them the title but next leading contender to fight Bradley. Just because it does not fit with Amir’s time table he forces the WBC to strip Bradley just so he can get another strap. Bradley is the best fighter at the weight and he can only lose that in the ring or inactivity which must be longer than a year at least.
    Now you are moaning about a fight that hasn't even been arranged yet

    You people are unbelievable.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley not stripped from title but has the very new title of "champion in recess

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The reality is that Khan will now fight for WBC strap against Morales or who ever beats him and move to 147lb welterweight without fighting Bradley who really is the best fighter at the weight. That is wrong and perverse, if the WBC are a not for profit making organisation they should not grant them the title but next leading contender to fight Bradley. Just because it does not fit with Amir’s time table he forces the WBC to strip Bradley just so he can get another strap. Bradley is the best fighter at the weight and he can only lose that in the ring or inactivity which must be longer than a year at least.
    What are you whinging about? Amir Khan is somehow getting the WBC to strip Bradley so he can avoid fighting him, even though he offered a 50-50 split on everything when Bradley had the belt?

    That has to be the stupidest thing you've ever posted.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 12:18 AM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-07-2011, 03:23 PM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-15-2009, 02:04 AM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:55 PM
  5. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 01:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing