Re: Bernard Hopkins Vs Julian Jackson

Originally Posted by
Bomp

Originally Posted by
ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by
Bomp
Prime B-hop for me, probably by KO as well after wearing him down. JJ was one hell of a puncher though, freakish power, but still reckon the best chins could handle him like Hagler. McCallum managed it, once he got over the rough patch he just broke him down.
He didn't catch McCallum flush though he caught him few good shots but not flush Jackson would ko Hopkins if he made one mistake but Hopkins should win this.
I agree with you, but the point I'm trying to make is that the best fighters very rarely get caught flush. Hagler and MacCallum had excellent chins, but they were also very good at keeping there chins down, so while they often took big punches, they were never really flush shots like the one JJ landed on graham.
The impresison I get from JJ is that he was a very good fighter, but just seemed to come unstuck against the very best well schooled fighters, which is what B-hop is. Even though JJ would have a punchers chance against Hopkins, I'd rate it as a very slim chance, less than one fight in 10.
Agreed.
If you hear a voice within you saying that I am not a painter, then by all means paint and that voice will be silenced.
Bookmarks