First of all Roy had a different style to Leonard. Leonard used to take quite a few shots like he did against Hearns and Duran. Jones wouldn't do this no way, his counter punching and speed would have given Hearns fits. Also I like the way that you bring in the Tarver fight. That happened AFTER Roys venture to HW after which it was clear that Jones destroyed his own body by dropping back down to LHW. Why not use examples like Toney, Virgil Hill, Bernard Hopkins (28 years old), Mike McCallum and Reggie Johnson? At least Roy was in his prime and was still able bodied. To compare 2 men p4p, one who peaked at LHW to a man who peaked at Lightweight is impossible especially in this case because of obvious things such as Roys chin, that could not be counted beacuse he was being hit by a LHW when he was KO'd not a Lightweight and it wasn't until he was totally weight drained that we found out Roy had a weak chin (probably didn't before this). Duran was a great pressure fighter who was active throughout the whole fight and is without doubt one of the all time greats, but look at what Roy did to a good pressure fighter in Paz. I know he was nowhere near the quality of Duran but this is the only example of anything like Durans style I could think of that Roy has faced. Roy Jones is a better fighter P4P than Duran IMO and like Joe Tesatore said when talking about the fact he is sometimes criticised for his fights being too easy "well thats not his fault, he is just too good for his own good".
Difference is Duran proved this by constantly fighting the best fighter his resume is superb Roys compared... well, thats all im gonna say.. well..
We will never know how good Roy was because he only really fought two elite fighters in Toney and Tarver and he lost one. Hopkins was a good win but Hopkins at 38 would obliterate Hopkins of 28.
Jones was a great fighter very skilled but against who? Roy is the best fighter in the last 15yrs imo but i thinl Sugar Ray Tommy Hears and Roberto Duran all beat him p4p.
Roys best win ( on paper atleast ) was against James Toney or Bernard Hopkins yet even though he wasnt particluary sensational in either of those fights I think at his best Jones is possibly the greatest fighter ever.
I think Jones is the best athlete of our era in any sport.
I think hes the most talented fighter of all time.
If it wasnt for Sugar Ray Robinsons crazy record, i would have Roy as the greatest of all time. He may be.
Excellent write up Taeth. Roy is the greatest fighter I have ever seen, and would have been regarded as the greatest ever if he retired after Ruiz. However his legacy would look good with a victory over Galzaghe and not harmed.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
You rest your case? Wow that really convinces me that you have any idea about what your talking about.
What is the Tony- Tarver thing? He definitely hasn't been the same fighter comming back down.
He definitely was the best athlete ever, nobody had his combination of reflexes, speed, and power. He was nearly as fast as Leonard, Mosley, Taylor, etc were at their prime weight classes, but he was 3-5 weight classes above them. Of any of the fast guys except WW Robinson he had more power then all of them. He had the best reflexes we have ever seen, even Ali, Whitaker, Mayweather, Leonard couldn't compare to him.
Who did Roy Jones Jr fight who were respectable competition in any era? James Toney, Bernard Hopkins, Mike Maccallum, Virgill Hill, Clinton Woods, Julio Gonzalez, Reggie Johnson, Montell Griffin, Tony Thornton, and there are more, but my point is that Roy fought plenty of respectable competition especially James Toney who would have been right in the mix in any middleweight era, and Roy Jones Jr dominated all of them. Look how well Clinton Woods has done against Glen Johnson, and other guys now, and watch his fight against a past his prime Roy Jones Jr. who wasn't shot. He was completely owned. Same with Johnson, Hill, Johnson, Griffin in their second fight.
Think about it this way if you took away Leonard's great chin he would have been knocked out by Hearns, Hagler, Duran, and other guys as he went higher up.
If you took away Hagler's chin, he would have been KO'ed many times based on skill alone.
Same with DUran, Hearns was KO'ed his fair share.
Roy got KO'ed way above his natural weight class(LHW) only after he came way back down from HW. He looked tiny at LHW against guys like Hill, Telesco, Harmon, Glen Kelly, Gonzalez.
You can't put him as one of the best fighters, you can't put him up there with Ali, Leonard, Armstrong, Pep, Robinson, etc. not because he wasn't as good as them, but because he didn't fight enough of the right caliber of opponents to deserve it. I think he is as good as them, but he won't be in their league because of who he fought and thats valid to a degree.
Also about the athletic thing again its like a hundred meter dash, you don't need to have the fastest guys around you to be the fastest yourself. Roy Jones Jr didn't need to be fighting Hagler, Hearns, etc to change the fact htat he was a better athlete then any of them. Your competition doesn't mean shit about what kind of athlete you are.
That being said, no boxer is the top athlete in the world, and have never been the best athletes ever like Michael Vick, Usain Bolt, Wilt Chamberlain, Bo Jackson, Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Deon Sanders, etc are far more athletic then Roy Jones Jr, and they would all be better at far more sports then Roy Jones Jr would be good at. He is the best boxing athlete ever, but that is not saying much. Boxing hasn't been overly about athleticism. ALi couldn't compare to Chamberlain, Leonard wouldn't have compared to Deon Sanders, Michael JOrdan wouldn't have compared to Randy Moss, Michael Vick, L. James, Tomlinson, R. Bush, etc. Or Bo Jackson either.
I mean Michael Jordan ran a 4.3 40, he had a 42 inch vertical jump.
Michael Vick 4.27 40, 40+ vertical jump, 550 pound bench press, 650 squat, etc,etc
Wilt Chamberlain: 500 pound bench press, low 10's 100 meter dash, competitive ,at the time, Olympic level high jump.
Bo Jackson: 225 pounds 4.18 40 yard dash great at football and baseball same with Deon Sanders who ran a 4.22 40
Usain Bolt: Best 100 and 200 meter runner ever, and he has only done 100 meters this year pretty much.
While it's very hard to say, Roy took athleticism to an entirely different level. Really, he has to be one of the most athletic guys to step into the ring, his athleticism was his game. But back to my original point, even with their physical gifts fading, if he was one of the smartest fighters of all time he would have fought past that and still won meaningful fights like guys like Leonard, Hopkins, Toney, Holyfiels all were probably smarter fighters imo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks