I can't see Calzaghe with how he throws punches being effective against these guys, I think people forget just how sharp these guys were in their prime. Sure Joe had more power in his prime, but he still threw the same sort of punches and thats where his flaw lies.
In their prime Toney and Hopkins to rattle off a tremendous work rate if they needed to, they would easily throw 600 punches, they would all be sharp, accurate, damaging punches. Joe is fast, but Toney and Hopkins punched straighter. Hell I thought Hopkins when you take into account his reaction time and mental speed was as fast or faster then Calzaghe, He reacted quicker, he got hit less % wise if you are actually looking at real punches. It was Calzaghe who was forced to rever to slapping punches to land anything against Bernard because he couldn't hit B-Hop solidly with anything.
I can't imagine how many right hands he would walk into against James Toney. Watch the fight with him againt Michael Nunn, who was a more orthodox boxer with more speed then Calzaghe, Toney was losing rounds but he was landing that right over and over again. I don't see Calzaghe landing that much, and I see him as being a lot easier to hit then Michael Nunn was. This matchup is horrible for Joe Calzaghe because Toney could punch through anything(except a prime Roy's attack). I was going to make a thread earlier today about people ahve forgotten the greatness of prime James Toney, and what he brought to the table.
Bookmarks