Hoko.......not the greatest but very exciting
Lennox Lewis for me - the man did it all.
Last edited by yvonne; 01-11-2009 at 08:51 PM.
Haha Yes abit lazy on my part.
Heres my list of best in each weight
Heavyweight Lennox Lewis
Cruiserweight David Haye
Light Heavyweight Dennis Andries
Super Middleweight Nigel Benn
Middleweight Randolph Turpin
Jnr Middleweight Maurice Hope
Welterweight Lloyd Honeyghan
Jnr Welterweight Jackie Kid Berg
Lightweight Freddie Welsh
Jnr Lightweight Jim Mcdonnell
Featherweight Barry McGuigan/Jim Driscoll
Super Bantam Naseem Hamed
Bantamweight Duke Mckenzie
Flyweight Jimmy Wilde
Clearly Lennox Lewis
Im not being sensitive at all your the one being sensitive. You had a pop at me in your first post about Ricky Hatton not being there, then i replied back in a respectful way and my last comment was a joke comment which is why i winked at the end of my post, to let you know that my last comment was a joke.
Now you have to have a dig at me and take it too the next level ? too be honest i don't want a debate with you after a comment like that. I have never claimed to know more than anyone on here, nor do i make out im a boxing historian. But i do read up alot of boxing and i do boxing myself, so i would like to think i do know quite a bit about boxing. But nowhere near as much as some guys/girls on here.
Infact the only thing i've done wrong here was give my opinion which obviously riled you up, because you rolled your eyes on my first post then had a dig at me in your 2nd post. If you don't like my opinions, don't reply to me or don't make such subjective threads because everyone has a different opinion.
Last edited by ICB; 01-11-2009 at 09:16 PM.
Jimmy Wilde for me, he had such great longevity and fought so many guys much bigger than himself .... kayoed most of them as well.
If we want to go right back, there was people like Tom Cribb and Jem Mace, but they were prizefighters and not boxers.
I'd have Calzaghe up there - a long career showing he was no flash in the pan and stayed at the top throughout, great chin, professionalism, good skills, OK poncher. Lennox would be there too, but I can't help thinking that he REALLY learned to box in Canada. Loved Nigel Benn, rated Conteh as probably our best talent but he wasted much of it.
I would have to say that I would rate Buchanan higher than Hatton - better skills, less susceptible to cuts, all round technician and tough as nails too, possibly better punch resistance than Ricky (who's all action style will lead to a shorter career a la Smokin Joe)
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Can u answer his question tho? I mean Buchanan was a good fighter but i cannot see how he could be rated as a much better fighter than Hatton? You said Ricky doesnt deserve to be mentioned with these 'legends' but i believe his record is already better than Buchanans or at the least just as good.
I think u are falling into the trap of rating older fighters higher just cos they are older. Freddy Welsh had a pretty good record but a lot of losses, and he fought around WWI, how do u know how good he was?
To me it's Lennox hands down! Then, and this may seem unfair but his one huge achievement surpasses so many other brits great careers, Randy Turpin.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks