Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: Opinions on fights that confuse you

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1506
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Not even so much official decisions that you see as bad, everybody's got to have some contrarian opinions on certain fights, these are, among others, mine.

    Mosley-De La Hoya II- I actually agreed with the decision but I could see how people might think Oscar won, its this insistence by some that he was robbed that confuses me. He at best won a close decision. Shane was clearly landing the harder punches and Oscar, as usual, got too much credit for flurries that didn't really land

    Bernard Hopkins-Jermain Taylor II- I think Hopkins clearly won this fight.
    A lot of people seem not to. The first fight is more debatable, Bernard clearly waited too long although its not like Taylor was doing much. But the second fight is almost to the point of not even being debatable to me, Bernard clearly won a majority of the rounds.

    JMM-Barrera-I've been a fan of Barrera's for a long long time but he clearly lost this fight IMO. If I remember correctly I wasn't really able to post on Saddo's around this fight so I remember being shocked by how close people thought it was or that some people thought he won. I just don't see it.

    Anyway, thoughts?
    How did Hopkins win against Taylor the second time? Taylor was landing too many more solid punches.

    Mosley-ODLH II- it was close...ish, but Oscar was landing so much more, despite Mosley landing the harder punches he was landing half as often. I wasn't given Oscar credit for missed flurries but some of those punches got through, it wasn't liek when he fought Mayweather.

    Marquez-Barrera: Marquez won a close fight, how could you score it otherwise, it was like they were both shadow boxing in the mirror, Barrera deserved a knockdown in the fight and was ahead in the first half of the fight.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Not even so much official decisions that you see as bad, everybody's got to have some contrarian opinions on certain fights, these are, among others, mine.

    Mosley-De La Hoya II- I actually agreed with the decision but I could see how people might think Oscar won, its this insistence by some that he was robbed that confuses me. He at best won a close decision. Shane was clearly landing the harder punches and Oscar, as usual, got too much credit for flurries that didn't really land

    Bernard Hopkins-Jermain Taylor II- I think Hopkins clearly won this fight.
    A lot of people seem not to. The first fight is more debatable, Bernard clearly waited too long although its not like Taylor was doing much. But the second fight is almost to the point of not even being debatable to me, Bernard clearly won a majority of the rounds.

    JMM-Barrera-I've been a fan of Barrera's for a long long time but he clearly lost this fight IMO. If I remember correctly I wasn't really able to post on Saddo's around this fight so I remember being shocked by how close people thought it was or that some people thought he won. I just don't see it.

    Anyway, thoughts?
    How did Hopkins win against Taylor the second time? Taylor was landing too many more solid punches.

    Mosley-ODLH II- it was close...ish, but Oscar was landing so much more, despite Mosley landing the harder punches he was landing half as often. I wasn't given Oscar credit for missed flurries but some of those punches got through, it wasn't liek when he fought Mayweather.

    Marquez-Barrera: Marquez won a close fight, how could you score it otherwise, it was like they were both shadow boxing in the mirror, Barrera deserved a knockdown in the fight and was ahead in the first half of the fight.
    I don't know, if you argue Taylor won through activity, ok but that's not how I score fights, clean punches? Hell no, Bernard landed the cleaner shots.

    I thought Shane landed the cleaner, harder punches. I won't spend a lot of time debating it as I'm not gonna argue that Oscar couldn't have gotten the nod, it was a close fight, I just was always baffled by robbery talk.

    Barrera-Marquez I've only seen once and I don't remember my exact scorecard but it depends on what you think is close, I definitely had Marquez winning by more than a point or two, he was just doing more effective work most of the rounds.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Nationalism in opinions on fighters and fights
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 07-25-2008, 09:39 PM
  2. Why do people confuse exposure with hype?
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-18-2007, 12:18 AM
  3. Women confuse me...
    By AdamGB in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-29-2007, 08:35 PM
  4. Help, Im Confuse
    By shadow-boxer in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-19-2006, 08:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing