Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Catchweights Fights, better than nothing or rather have nothing?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    If a potential mega fight betweeen two fighters from different weight classes can be made only at catchweight, with neither fighter willing to go to the other fighter's weight class because he is too small or too big would you rather they fought at an agreed catchweight so we can enjoy the spectacle and ultimate goal of our sport to see the best fight the best or would you rather the fight did not take place at all than to see the traditions of weight classes so violated?


    Also a secondary question to ponder. Why is it when two fighters in different weight classes could meet, its always assumed that its the little guys responsibility to move UP and not for the other fighter to move down? Is not the responsibility upon the two EQUAL? If Manny is regarded as universally p4p number 1 then why should any weight agreement involve him being a 'man' and moving up, and not the other guys being 'men' and giving up some weight?

    And if the bigger fighter does not believe he can safely lose the weight, or that by doing so he gives up too much, what is actually wrong with them meeting halfway to ensure the fight still happens?
    Last edited by Kev; 07-03-2009 at 09:56 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    If a potential mega fight betweeen two fighters from different weight classes can be made only at catchweight, with neither fighter willing to go to the other fighter's weight class because he is too small or too big would you rather they fought at an agreed catchweight or would you rather the fight did not take place at all?
    Honestly... I''d rather it not take place.

    I would like to see Crusierweight and Super Middleweight go away. Too many choices.

    Getting rid of Jr. Batamweight and Jr. Flyweight wouldn't be a bad idea either.


    Sorry. I clicked edit instead of quote.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    If a potential mega fight betweeen two fighters from different weight classes can be made only at catchweight, with neither fighter willing to go to the other fighter's weight class because he is too small or too big would you rather they fought at an agreed catchweight or would you rather the fight did not take place at all?
    Honestly... I''d rather it not take place.

    I would like to see Crusierweight and Super Middleweight go away. Too many choices.

    Getting rid of Jr. Batamweight and Jr. Flyweight wouldn't be a bad idea either.


    Sorry. I clicked edit instead of quote.

    So you think it's more important to have set weight classes than for fighters to fight at the best weight?

    In the case of the supermiddleweight division for example you'd rather guys like Bute, Froch, Kessler, Andrade et al were to fight at a less than ideal weight class, where their potential is not fully realised and we wouldn't get to appreciate them fighting at 100% than you would have to put up with another weight class?

    What I'm saying is what's more important. The best fighters fighting at their best weights to give us the best and most competitive fights or to force fighters to fit in with fixed weight classes?

    I mean who is the sport for ultimately, the boxers and fans and having the best fights, or traditions and weight class rules?

    Don't you think its putting the cart in front of the horse?

    And honestly, if Cotto versus Pacquaio happens at 143 you won't be watching it?
    Last edited by Kev; 07-03-2009 at 10:05 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1078
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    to be honest if it gets a fight made that i want to see and none of the fighters are at too much of a disadvantage then i think its ok

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    I voted YES. But it should be a non-title.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in space
    Posts
    1,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1078
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by ASIAN SENSATION View Post
    I voted YES. But it should be a non-title.
    i agree

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla View Post
    Honestly... I''d rather it not take place.

    I would like to see Crusierweight and Super Middleweight go away. Too many choices.

    Getting rid of Jr. Batamweight and Jr. Flyweight wouldn't be a bad idea either.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    So you think it's more important to have set weight classes than for fighters to fight at the best weight?

    In the case of the supermiddleweight division for example you'd rather guys like Bute, Froch, Kessler, Andrade et al were to fight at a less than ideal weight class, where their potential is not fully realised and we wouldn't get to appreciate them fighting at 100% than you would have to put up with another weight class?.
    I think Cruiserweight helped ruin the heavyweight divison. It made it okay for all the heavys to be overweight and sloppy. Besides, The Cruisers all seem to wind up as heavyweights eventually. Great fights are lost when fighters hide between lightheavy and heavy weights.

    As far as Kessler and them... They could fight at 168. Lightheavy is in the runnin' for best divison in boxiing history


    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    I mean who is the sport for ultimately, the boxers and fans and having the best fights, or traditions and weight class rules?

    Don't you think its putting the cart in front of the horse?

    And honestly, if Cotto versus Pacquaio happens at 143 you won't be watching it?
    LOL Oh, I'll watch it!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    And honestly, if Cotto versus Pacquaio happens at 143 you won't be watching it?
    Quote Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla View Post
    LOL Oh, I'll watch it!

    It's like when two of your buddies are about to fight. At first you remind them that it's a bad idea, but at some point you say,

    "Let 'em fight."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    I am fine with the catchweights if it helps get great fighters in the ring together. Who cares if it is 143 or 147, as long as you are going to see some great fighters in the ring....The bonus of the catchweight is it basically says F-you to the sanctioning bodies who are useless corrupt a-holes anyway.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,604
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1598
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    I voted hell no, stop letting these guys pansy around avoiding fights. They should for one have a purse for these fights winner gets a lot looser gets a little. No 1 should always be fighting no 2 etc and so forth. No more people like hopkins taking up a spot in a weightclass looking for the biggest money fight anywhere across the board instead of just letting dawson get in that old ass. All these catchweights are freakin silly. Next guys will be wanting to make fights with one guy on his knees and shit to try and make it fair, then the old one arm behind the back thing wont be far behind. Wanna know why boxing was better back in the day look at all the silly shit they do now and charge us for compared to what they did back then....which was just fight. No Bs 24/7 crap needed to get people to watch.
    Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    This fight can be at a catchweight, but again, unless both have the opportunity to meet at the 147 limit, the fight should not be for the Welterweight title.

  12. #12
    Bilbo's Mom Guest

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    This fight can be at a catchweight, but again, unless both have the opportunity to meet at the 147 limit, the fight should not be for the Welterweight title.

    Who cares if its for a title or not?

    These guys (Manny, Cotto, Mosely, Oscar, Floyd, Marquez etc) have all conquered multiple weight classes and won mulitple world titles.

    They are the elite fighters of our age and now the ultimate challenge for them is to fight each other, not for more 'belts'

    These fights between p4p stars who have won world titles across divisions are BIGGER than the weight class they take place in and the belts they fight for.

    It's not about world titles to these guys now, its about fighting the very best.

    It's the HIGHEST GOAL of boxing. The weight classes and belts (appalling as they are) exist to provide us with a framework in which to find the best fighters but once they are p4p greats they transcend that.

    The fights most fans want to see, the fights the fighters themselves want are the fights against other p4p champions.

    As they all don't weigh the same one fighter fighting in another fighters weight class disadvantages himself and as we no longer care in these instances about weight classes or belts (the fight is bigger than this now) they compromise and meet in the middle.

    It's totally fair, it's totally acceptable.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    288
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    859
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    There should be no catchweights anymore, there are 17 divisions now, if you can't fight within the limit of one of these 17 then you shouldn't fight at all. I don't want to see Darchinyan and Klitschko fight at a "catchweight."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    11,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2420
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by "The L.A. Earthquake" View Post
    There should be no catchweights anymore, there are 17 divisions now, if you can't fight within the limit of one of these 17 then you shouldn't fight at all. I don't want to see Darchinyan and Klitschko fight at a "catchweight."


    Klit in 12
    Hidden Content

    Marching Towards the Abyss...............

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Different poll on DLH-Pac
    By TitoFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 11:55 AM
  2. Poll about Hatton
    By Puya in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 05:31 AM
  3. HBO POLL
    By Puya in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-13-2007, 06:52 PM
  4. Poll: Which fight would you rather see in '08?
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-22-2007, 04:56 PM
  5. Poll
    By boozeboxer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2007, 05:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing