Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Catchweights Fights, better than nothing or rather have nothing?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3156
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    I dont mind if its a rare occasion...

    Most are growing quite weary of Manny "Pander for Catchweight' Pacquiao

    If you wanna fight the best in the higher weight class than fight that fighter were he is strongest, he's already making a living at that weight and is flourishing. If not than stay in your own weight class.

    It's really quite simple.. The rigors an bigger guy has to go thru to boil down in weight leaves him drained and not as vibrant or 100% The guy moving up can diet better and not deprive himself of the substance and fortitude his body needs to operate at optimal level. There is no abuse of dehydrate, steam rooms, no water. Etc

    Like I said an occasional Catchweight is fine but when a fighter and his trainer are trying to blatantly cheat history by chooching a 7th title from a weaken drained fighter is pathetic and exhausting

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    967
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    I dont mind if its a rare occasion...

    Most are growing quite weary of Manny "Pander for Catchweight' Pacquiao

    If you wanna fight the best in the higher weight class than fight that fighter were he is strongest, he's already making a living at that weight and is flourishing. If not than stay in your own weight class.

    It's really quite simple.. The rigors an bigger guy has to go thru to boil down in weight leaves him drained and not as vibrant or 100% The guy moving up can diet better and not deprive himself of the substance and fortitude his body needs to operate at optimal level. There is no abuse of dehydrate, steam rooms, no water. Etc

    Like I said an occasional Catchweight is fine but when a fighter and his trainer are trying to blatantly cheat history by chooching a 7th title from a weaken drained fighter is pathetic and exhausting
    I'm pretty sure all of the members here pretty much know that I'm not a Pacman fan. But when did he ever fought at a catch weight? The Oscar fight? That was at a 147 pound limit. Oscar and Pacman was 3 weight classes apart. So they met at the welterweight limit. I don't think it's reasonable to expect a guy to jump 3 weight classes. No boxing fan would want any fighter to jump from 135 to 154 for a mega fight, for it would be too one sided of a fight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3156
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    I dont mind if its a rare occasion...

    Most are growing quite weary of Manny "Pander for Catchweight' Pacquiao

    If you wanna fight the best in the higher weight class than fight that fighter were he is strongest, he's already making a living at that weight and is flourishing. If not than stay in your own weight class.

    It's really quite simple.. The rigors an bigger guy has to go thru to boil down in weight leaves him drained and not as vibrant or 100% The guy moving up can diet better and not deprive himself of the substance and fortitude his body needs to operate at optimal level. There is no abuse of dehydrate, steam rooms, no water. Etc

    Like I said an occasional Catchweight is fine but when a fighter and his trainer are trying to blatantly cheat history by chooching a 7th title from a weaken drained fighter is pathetic and exhausting
    I'm pretty sure all of the members here pretty much know that I'm not a Pacman fan. But when did he ever fought at a catch weight? The Oscar fight? That was at a 147 pound limit. Oscar and Pacman was 3 weight classes apart. So they met at the welterweight limit. I don't think it's reasonable to expect a guy to jump 3 weight classes. No boxing fan would want any fighter to jump from 135 to 154 for a mega fight, for it would be too one sided of a fight.
    UH No, I'm talking about Pac and Roach wanting Cotto and Mosely at catchweight or no fight.. DLH was fine at 147 but not those guys

    Roach said he would fight Floyd at 147, how come not the rest

    He already stated he wouldnt let pac fight at a weight disadvantage... then why try to call out a Welter then?
    Last edited by JT Rock; 07-03-2009 at 06:04 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Yes or No Poll regarding Catchweights

    I don't remember Pac or Roach calling out anyone after the Hatton. I think it's the other way around. These bigger guys are whoring out for Pac and would fight Pac at catchweight because of the money.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Different poll on DLH-Pac
    By TitoFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 11:55 AM
  2. Poll about Hatton
    By Puya in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 05:31 AM
  3. HBO POLL
    By Puya in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-13-2007, 06:52 PM
  4. Poll: Which fight would you rather see in '08?
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-22-2007, 04:56 PM
  5. Poll
    By boozeboxer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2007, 05:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing