Hopkins wants 60-40, RJJ wants 60 to the winner 40 to the loser cant argue with that as Nard aint exactly in the PPV big league and RJJ cant get a slot on HBO without another big name.
Calvin Murphy Podcasts 2
Hopkins wants 60-40, RJJ wants 60 to the winner 40 to the loser cant argue with that as Nard aint exactly in the PPV big league and RJJ cant get a slot on HBO without another big name.
Calvin Murphy Podcasts 2
Last edited by skel1983; 08-21-2009 at 09:14 PM.
Nice find.
Jones is hilarious and at the same time talking complete sense.
Jones Jr already beat Hopkins quite decisively. In fact I like the idea of winner takes 60%. All fights should have that kind of motivational factor. Of course, BHop cannot handle the conversation.
i actually wouldnt mind seeing this fight. really should have happened a long time ago though.
Why doesn't Hopkins want to make this fight? When it was suggested that the winner takes all he disappeared. imo he would be the favorite in this fight & its a chance to avenge his loss.
I agree this fight should have been made years ago (& I would have favored Jones) but I can't understand why B Hop ain't jumping at the chance to show Roy up... RJ even said Hopkins can pick the judges!
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
Wow, im surprised that Bernard would not accept 60-40, winner taker the lions share. Sounds very fair to me. Roy has more to lose too imo.
Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle
Surely if you think that Lacy was schooled he should fight on, or is it an acceptance that Lacy wasn't a threat and therefore even though he was schooled it was a meaningless fight.
Agree that it should have happened an age ago, some of these fights are just people trading on their name and I believe it's a bit of a let down for the paying public.
They fought in their primes and Jones won. Why do we need to kow who's aged better?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks