Does Khan leaving Warren mean we will see Hatton against Khan later this year?

[Fenster]

Nope, for the simple fact hatton wouldnt take this fight in a million years

Im sick and tired of us brits believing we can match the big american promotions and stick our 2 best guys together when theres much more money in hatton fighting someone hand picked by golden boy.

Fucks sake Hammer.. same old backwards rubbish. Not more than 4 weeks ago you were shown why this is nonsense.

Tell you what, if im wrong and ricky hatton and amir khan do fight i will forever change my username, sig, avatar etc to whatever you may like

Its the same old backwards shit again....

"Calzaghe should fight woods"
"hatton should fight witter"
"calzaghe should fight froch"

These fights dont get decided on who`s ranked where in the boxing world or where they were born. We live in a commercially dominated industry where the fights tha make both financial and realistic sense get made. The era of eubank-benn-watson is dead. The big fights of the 21st century more often than not take place in las vegas because thats where the true money is in world boxng not the MEN arena manchester.

If every single american promotion ditched hatton in some kind of mass protest then sure hatton-khan could happen. But read my words IT WONT

Your new name is Trigger.

You are totally clueless.

Hatton-Khan would fill a stadium. Hatton can sell out the MEN three times over fighting a complete nobody. Khan sells 10,000 tickets fighting complete nobodies. They are both "stars" outside boxing in Britain. They are both PPV fighters. The reason the days of Benn-Eubank are over, is because it's only once in a bluemoon two Brit stars happen at the same time.

The only reason Hatton said he wouldn't fight Khan before is Warren. He's out of the picture now, hence Hatton-Khan now entertaining the idea.

[HattonTheHammer]

Fucks sake Hammer.. same old backwards rubbish. Not more than 4 weeks ago you were shown why this is nonsense.

Tell you what, if im wrong and ricky hatton and amir khan do fight i will forever change my username, sig, avatar etc to whatever you may like

Its the same old backwards shit again....

"Calzaghe should fight woods"
"hatton should fight witter"
"calzaghe should fight froch"

These fights dont get decided on who`s ranked where in the boxing world or where they were born. We live in a commercially dominated industry where the fights tha make both financial and realistic sense get made. The era of eubank-benn-watson is dead. The big fights of the 21st century more often than not take place in las vegas because thats where the true money is in world boxng not the MEN arena manchester.

If every single american promotion ditched hatton in some kind of mass protest then sure hatton-khan could happen. But read my words IT WONT

Your new name is Trigger.

You are totally clueless.

Hatton-Khan would fill a stadium. Hatton can sell out the MEN three times over fighting a complete nobody. Khan sells 10,000 tickets fighting complete nobodies. They are both "stars" outside boxing in Britain. They are both PPV fighters. The reason the days of Benn-Eubank are over, is because it's only once in a bluemoon two Brit stars happen at the same time.

The only reason Hatton said he wouldn't fight Khan before is Warren. He's out of the picture now, hence Hatton-Khan now entertaining the idea.

Pacquiao-mayweather could of filled the dallas cowboys stadium twice over. But it was still common knowledge that it would of been held in the 14,000 mgm grand...wonder why??

Indeed they are, one has sold close to a million PPV buys in america. The other has sold a few hundred thousand in the united kingdom. I really dont even have to explain what the difference is there.

Nobody more than me would wanna see that fight go down. But again IT WONT HAPPEN

ps:if im trigger then you sir are micky pearce

[Fenster]

Tell you what, if im wrong and ricky hatton and amir khan do fight i will forever change my username, sig, avatar etc to whatever you may like

Its the same old backwards shit again....

"Calzaghe should fight woods"
"hatton should fight witter"
"calzaghe should fight froch"

These fights dont get decided on who`s ranked where in the boxing world or where they were born. We live in a commercially dominated industry where the fights tha make both financial and realistic sense get made. The era of eubank-benn-watson is dead. The big fights of the 21st century more often than not take place in las vegas because thats where the true money is in world boxng not the MEN arena manchester.

If every single american promotion ditched hatton in some kind of mass protest then sure hatton-khan could happen. But read my words IT WONT

Your new name is Trigger.

You are totally clueless.

Hatton-Khan would fill a stadium. Hatton can sell out the MEN three times over fighting a complete nobody. Khan sells 10,000 tickets fighting complete nobodies. They are both "stars" outside boxing in Britain. They are both PPV fighters. The reason the days of Benn-Eubank are over, is because it's only once in a bluemoon two Brit stars happen at the same time.

The only reason Hatton said he wouldn't fight Khan before is Warren. He's out of the picture now, hence Hatton-Khan now entertaining the idea.

Pacquiao-mayweather could of filled the dallas cowboys stadium twice over. But it was still common knowledge that it would of been held in the 14,000 mgm grand...wonder why??

Indeed they are, one has sold close to a million PPV buys in america. The other has sold a few hundred thousand in the united kingdom. I really dont even have to explain what the difference is there.

Nobody more than me would wanna see that fight go down. But again IT WONT HAPPEN

ps:if im trigger then you sir are micky pearce

Mayweather-Pac are American based fighters, Hatton-Khan don't have a Vegas option you funking imbecile.

[skel1983]

Tell you what, if im wrong and ricky hatton and amir khan do fight i will forever change my username, sig, avatar etc to whatever you may like

Its the same old backwards shit again....

"Calzaghe should fight woods"
"hatton should fight witter"
"calzaghe should fight froch"

These fights dont get decided on who`s ranked where in the boxing world or where they were born. We live in a commercially dominated industry where the fights tha make both financial and realistic sense get made. The era of eubank-benn-watson is dead. The big fights of the 21st century more often than not take place in las vegas because thats where the true money is in world boxng not the MEN arena manchester.

If every single american promotion ditched hatton in some kind of mass protest then sure hatton-khan could happen. But read my words IT WONT

Your new name is Trigger.

You are totally clueless.

Hatton-Khan would fill a stadium. Hatton can sell out the MEN three times over fighting a complete nobody. Khan sells 10,000 tickets fighting complete nobodies. They are both "stars" outside boxing in Britain. They are both PPV fighters. The reason the days of Benn-Eubank are over, is because it's only once in a bluemoon two Brit stars happen at the same time.

The only reason Hatton said he wouldn't fight Khan before is Warren. He's out of the picture now, hence Hatton-Khan now entertaining the idea.

Pacquiao-mayweather could of filled the dallas cowboys stadium twice over. But it was still common knowledge that it would of been held in the 14,000 mgm grand...wonder why??

Indeed they are, one has sold close to a million PPV buys in america. The other has sold a few hundred thousand in the united kingdom. I really dont even have to explain what the difference is there.

Nobody more than me would wanna see that fight go down. But again IT WONT HAPPEN

ps:if im trigger then you sir are micky pearce

Hammer mate your a decent bloke, but you come across quite clueless alot of the time, and quite suprising as you are one of Hatton's biggest fans.

Now let's have a look at the options to Hatton now, like I said earlier only bigger financial fights out there is Mayweather and Pacquiao for the simple reason they are the only two fights involving Hatton that would be on HBO PPV , any other fight will only be on normal HBO that's even if HBO are intrested in a Hatton fight at all, they were not intrested in the Lazcano fight, so depending on the opponent it will be either normal HBO or no HBO because he aint getting another shot at the two big boys in the near future.

So lets throw a few names out there Hammer that are bigger money fights then Khan?? You said earlier your run of the mill HBO/American fighter. So you think Hatton would get paid more fighting Marquez/urango/Bradley and similar foes than fight Khan how exactly

Like I said earlier the Hatton/Pac fight flopped at the box office in the uk even though it was a hugggge fight only 300k ppv's now Hatton got a 49/51 split for that fight on the basis of his last megafight with Floyd getting 1.4 million buys at the box office, now if Arum and Pac new that in advance that the fight would only do 300k in the Uk, do you think they would of gave Hatton a 49% split?? not a fucking chance. Hatton without Khan is not really a big fight in box office terms he has been beaton twice and pretty badly, how many PPV'S do you think that say a fight with Urango v Hatton would get maybe 250k if he is lucky, not rubbish figures but lets get Khan involved what do you think them figures will be now??

Fuck me David Haye got 800k ppv's against Valuev only 12 months earlier he was fighting Monte Barrett at the O2 in a less than half empty O2 even though there was a buy one get one free ticket.

Now Hatton and Khan are both PPV fighters at the moment and are the two biggest names to the casual fan or the British public in uk boxing. Id bet my bottom doller that Hatton/Khan would easily do a million ppv's id say over 1.5 million.

Now your other reason to say this wont happen is the Casino aspect, yes they pay top doller but Im not even sure Hatton is a Vegas fighter anyomre without a credible opponent maybe Marquez the demand would be there, but that money could be made up with 100 thousand people going to Wembley watching the fight.

So the figures Hammer lets have a look at them say that average ticket price £60 and minimum 1 million buys at 15 quid.

Thats 21 million quid there, thats without selling the fight to HBO Sponsership and other income coming for this bonanza fight.

So again please tell me mate how that sort of money would be generated for a run of the mill fight with a Urango type fighter?