Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: If it happens who wins?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1330
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If it happens who wins?

    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I've been watching froch fights from his debut again and have noticed he or he seems faster before 30 years of age, watch him against Damon Hague and Henry porras in Hollywood and tell me whats different from then to now and give your pros and cons
    The difference is that he was in against crap competition then.

    At the elite level, I've never though much of Froch. Big heart, great chin, but very slow and very poor fundamentals. So easy to hit.

    It's hard to say anything with confidence about Bute, since he hasn't faced anyone better than a super-faded 45 year-old Glen Johnson, but I'd still pick him to beat Froch. The only attribute where Froch has the advantage is chin, but Bute's not an eggshell like Jermain Taylor so I don't think that's much of an issue anyway.
    I think a little higher of Froch than Shza may because he has been able to earn wins against Glen Johnson, Andre Dirrell, and Jean Pascal. They're all quality combatants.

    As to Bute, Glen Johnson and Sakio Bika are both legitimate opponents. Not elite opponents like Ward and Froch, but compotent opponents nonetheless and he performed as expected. Froch is the next step in his progression.

    If you don't think much of Froch, does Ward still remain not proven in your eyes? I would argue Froch is Ward's best win. Other than Froch, it's Kessler, but I'm not sure how high I rate this version of Kessler. He seems to be injury-prone and on his last leg.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1071
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If it happens who wins?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I've been watching froch fights from his debut again and have noticed he or he seems faster before 30 years of age, watch him against Damon Hague and Henry porras in Hollywood and tell me whats different from then to now and give your pros and cons
    The difference is that he was in against crap competition then.

    At the elite level, I've never though much of Froch. Big heart, great chin, but very slow and very poor fundamentals. So easy to hit.

    It's hard to say anything with confidence about Bute, since he hasn't faced anyone better than a super-faded 45 year-old Glen Johnson, but I'd still pick him to beat Froch. The only attribute where Froch has the advantage is chin, but Bute's not an eggshell like Jermain Taylor so I don't think that's much of an issue anyway.
    I think a little higher of Froch than Shza may because he has been able to earn wins against Glen Johnson, Andre Dirrell, and Jean Pascal. They're all quality combatants.

    As to Bute, Glen Johnson and Sakio Bika are both legitimate opponents. Not elite opponents like Ward and Froch, but compotent opponents nonetheless and he performed as expected. Froch is the next step in his progression.

    If you don't think much of Froch, does Ward still remain not proven in your eyes? I would argue Froch is Ward's best win. Other than Froch, it's Kessler, but I'm not sure how high I rate this version of Kessler. He seems to be injury-prone and on his last leg.
    I said before the Froch fight that it would be a wide and easy fight for Ward, and it was exactly that.

    But so is Ward "proven"? He's certainly not "all time great" proven but he's about as proven as he could be, given the competition. I consider the Klitchkos proven too. Like them, it's notable and important that he's dropped very few rounds against the other guys at the top of the division, B+ fighters though they may be (the Klitchkos' competition has been basically C-level fighters, though no fault of theirs).

    I do think Kessler is a better win than Froch though, yes. "This version of Kessler" was still good enough to beat Froch, anyway (though it was, as I've said previously, the sloppiest and most amatueurish looking fight I've ever seen between two supposedly elite fighters).

    I also thought Froch lost to Dirrell, though I can understand how judges who value aggression over defense and skill could score it the other way. But I would definitely pick Dirrell in a rematch.

    I would like to see Ward against Dirrell and Bute and then ultimately against Chad Dawson. That one would be a true test.
    Last edited by shza; 01-05-2012 at 12:16 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1330
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If it happens who wins?

    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    I've been watching froch fights from his debut again and have noticed he or he seems faster before 30 years of age, watch him against Damon Hague and Henry porras in Hollywood and tell me whats different from then to now and give your pros and cons
    The difference is that he was in against crap competition then.

    At the elite level, I've never though much of Froch. Big heart, great chin, but very slow and very poor fundamentals. So easy to hit.

    It's hard to say anything with confidence about Bute, since he hasn't faced anyone better than a super-faded 45 year-old Glen Johnson, but I'd still pick him to beat Froch. The only attribute where Froch has the advantage is chin, but Bute's not an eggshell like Jermain Taylor so I don't think that's much of an issue anyway.
    I think a little higher of Froch than Shza may because he has been able to earn wins against Glen Johnson, Andre Dirrell, and Jean Pascal. They're all quality combatants.

    As to Bute, Glen Johnson and Sakio Bika are both legitimate opponents. Not elite opponents like Ward and Froch, but compotent opponents nonetheless and he performed as expected. Froch is the next step in his progression.

    If you don't think much of Froch, does Ward still remain not proven in your eyes? I would argue Froch is Ward's best win. Other than Froch, it's Kessler, but I'm not sure how high I rate this version of Kessler. He seems to be injury-prone and on his last leg.
    But so is Ward "proven"? He's certainly not "all time great" proven but he's about as proven as he could be, given the competition. I consider the Klitchkos proven too. Like them, it's notable and important that he's dropped very few rounds against the other guys at the top of the division, B+ fighters though they may be (the Klitchkos' competition has been basically C-level fighters, though no fault of theirs).
    So, then I'm assuming just for the sake of discussion that if Bute beats Froch and/or Kessler he's as proven as Ward is. I'm not saying he'll do either of those for sure, but I expect him to.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    797
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    In all honesty froch is old now. The froch from 2005 used to run around the ring and have prince Naseem reflexes but now seems hittable but then again he has had numerous leg and knee operations, hence why he kicks his leg backwards during most fights

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    797
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Froch is impossible to hit to the body with uppercuts, only person to get his body was Kessler and Kessler got ruined by doing so, froch was wobbling Kessler with every shot nearly, what makes bute think he can get away with getting close to froch and no getting hit, even wards face will tell u that close up with froch is like walking through a mine field!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    797
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Just can't see bute stopping froch

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1418
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If it happens who wins?

    Bute will probably beat him and then Froch will have to content himself with fucking his ridiculously fit bird for the rest of his days.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who wins?
    By AirJordanIV in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 01:27 AM
  2. 2 wins over mab 2 wins over eric
    By Julius Rain in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 10-11-2007, 04:55 PM
  3. JMM-MAB-how wins and how>???
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-10-2007, 07:04 PM
  4. Ponce De Leon wins/ Calderon wins
    By TaxanBaller in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-22-2006, 11:50 PM
  5. If Vic wins again...
    By Raz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 03:57 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing