Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: What are your Pet Peeves with ESPN?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1358
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What are your Pet Peeves with ESPN?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Maybe I'm in the minority (no pun intended), but I don't even see Native American Indians when I say the name Washington Redskins. It's just a team name. A very old, storied, traditional team name. Much like the Green Bay Packers, Cleveland Browns, New York Giants. Maybe back then a few narrow minds intended for the name to be offensive. But that was back then. Nowadays I seriously doubt anything offensive is intended by keeping the name. Where's it all gonna stop? I hear you Bean.... but I for one would be against changing the name.

    Racism is something that goes beyond a team name. It has to do with attitudes, behavior toward others, prejudices, etc. Once we open that Pandora's box and yield to the special interest groups Lyle alluded to, it's open season on every frigging name, logo, slogan, whatever that people want to change just for the hell of it.
    I hear ya, and I'm usually on the other side defending people from the racial witch hunt that everyone seems to like to participate in now a days.

    There's no getting away from the Native imagery of the Redskins though, the team logo is the feathers and a picture of a Native. The PC police think EVERYTHING is racist and inappropriate and a lot of times it's very tempting to go against them just for the sake of it, but I do think they have a point in this case with the term Redskin. There's no way you could call a Native a "redskin" without in being offensive, and I haven't seen any arguments for keeping it other than "it's always been this way and I like it". Enough Native tribes have come out and spoke against it to where it's a legit issue. I think the reasonable thing to do would be to keep the Native imagery and change the name to something that isn't offensive and is more of a tribute to the Natives, like the Braves or Blackhawks. I just feel like these people are holding out because of stubbornness, because they would have to admit they were wrong. Nobody would stand for the "Harlem Darkies", and society wouldn't tolerate any other ethnic group being referred to as "(insert colour here) skins". You can't call black people "darkies", or Asians "yellow skins".

    It just seems like a silly war to fight.
    David Lemieux = Future MW Champ and P4P King

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,776
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2026
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What are your Pet Peeves with ESPN?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Maybe I'm in the minority (no pun intended), but I don't even see Native American Indians when I say the name Washington Redskins. It's just a team name. A very old, storied, traditional team name. Much like the Green Bay Packers, Cleveland Browns, New York Giants. Maybe back then a few narrow minds intended for the name to be offensive. But that was back then. Nowadays I seriously doubt anything offensive is intended by keeping the name. Where's it all gonna stop? I hear you Bean.... but I for one would be against changing the name.

    Racism is something that goes beyond a team name. It has to do with attitudes, behavior toward others, prejudices, etc. Once we open that Pandora's box and yield to the special interest groups Lyle alluded to, it's open season on every frigging name, logo, slogan, whatever that people want to change just for the hell of it.
    I hear ya, and I'm usually on the other side defending people from the racial witch hunt that everyone seems to like to participate in now a days.

    There's no getting away from the Native imagery of the Redskins though, the team logo is the feathers and a picture of a Native. The PC police think EVERYTHING is racist and inappropriate and a lot of times it's very tempting to go against them just for the sake of it, but I do think they have a point in this case with the term Redskin. There's no way you could call a Native a "redskin" without in being offensive, and I haven't seen any arguments for keeping it other than "it's always been this way and I like it". Enough Native tribes have come out and spoke against it to where it's a legit issue. I think the reasonable thing to do would be to keep the Native imagery and change the name to something that isn't offensive and is more of a tribute to the Natives, like the Braves or Blackhawks. I just feel like these people are holding out because of stubbornness, because they would have to admit they were wrong. Nobody would stand for the "Harlem Darkies", and society wouldn't tolerate any other ethnic group being referred to as "(insert colour here) skins". You can't call black people "darkies", or Asians "yellow skins".

    It just seems like a silly war to fight.


    I'll say this:

    If the name had just come up for a new team, I'd be right up front decrying how racist it all is. But at this point in time, when I'm pretty sure zero percent of the people harbor racist feelings toward those with Native American Indian heritage..... it just seems a bit over-the-top for me.

    It's a timing issue for me, I guess.

  3. #18
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: What are your Pet Peeves with ESPN?

    I'd be saying it was racist if it was for a NEW team as well. Point is that the people who support changing the name are a teeny tiny group of people who are ALWAYS bitching about something and their happiness(they're never happy) is moment to moment if at all. Meaning that once they change the Redskins mascot to a potato or something they'd be after the next cause du jour be it FSU or the Blackhawks or whoever.


    I just HATE the PC brigade they're a constant irritant

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What are your Pet Peeves with ESPN?

    @@ pacman is bets

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. FNF on now ESPN.
    By beenKOed in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-17-2015, 07:56 AM
  2. Espn's top 10 p4p
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 10-01-2012, 05:58 PM
  3. Espn fnf 1-13
    By MMASUX in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 01-14-2012, 08:26 PM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-07-2012, 01:23 PM
  5. Pet Peeves
    By Truth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2009, 04:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing